2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-008-9104-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Technique for Simulating the Effect of Dose Reduction on Image Quality in Digital Chest Radiography

Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this study is to provide a pragmatic tool for studying the relationship between dose and image quality in clinical chest images. To achieve this, we developed a technique for simulating the effect of dose reduction on image quality of digital chest images. Materials and Methods: The technique was developed for a digital charge-coupled-device (CCD) chest unit with slot-scan acquisition. Raw pixel values were scaled to a lower dose level, and a random number representing noise to each spe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
36
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Subsequent studies used simulated dose reduction to demonstrate the potential for low-dose protocols in applications such as pediatric abdominal CT, 14 CT colonography, 15 chest CT, 16 and chest radiography. 17 More recently, simulated dose reduction methods have utilized more advanced models of noise beyond just quantum noise, such as inclusion of electronic noise, 18,19 that led to accurate reproduction of not only image noise magnitude but also noise power spectra. [20][21][22][23] Other extensions of simulated dose reduction include using dual energy scans to allow simulated changes in tube voltage 24 or using an image-based approach that does not assume availability of projection data (but does not allow for different reconstruction methods/parameters).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Subsequent studies used simulated dose reduction to demonstrate the potential for low-dose protocols in applications such as pediatric abdominal CT, 14 CT colonography, 15 chest CT, 16 and chest radiography. 17 More recently, simulated dose reduction methods have utilized more advanced models of noise beyond just quantum noise, such as inclusion of electronic noise, 18,19 that led to accurate reproduction of not only image noise magnitude but also noise power spectra. [20][21][22][23] Other extensions of simulated dose reduction include using dual energy scans to allow simulated changes in tube voltage 24 or using an image-based approach that does not assume availability of projection data (but does not allow for different reconstruction methods/parameters).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of researchers reported on methods for simulating reduced dose images. Such techniques have been applied in computed radiography (CR) [1], digital radiography (DR) [2,3], and computed tomography (CT) [4][5][6]. Bath et al developed an accurate simulation method for CR system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was based on the local standard deviation of the image. However, as shown by the authors themselves (VELDKAMP et al, 2009), although the simulated images have the same local standard deviation as real images, they have different NPS. Since the standard deviation is not a good metric of the image noise when comparing images with different NPS (BURGESS, 1999) , the clinical application of such method can be questioned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Such images are difficult to be arranged because it would imply exposing patients to several levels of radiation. To solve this issue, some works propose algorithms capable of simulating dose reduction in clinical mammograms (SAUNDERS; SAMEI, 2003;BATH et al, 2005;KROFT et al, 2006;VELDKAMP et al, 2009;SVALKVIST;BATH, 2010;MACKENZIE et al, 2012;MACKENZIE et al, 2014). The next chapter will present methods of performing this simulation and it will discuss limitations associated with these methods.…”
Section: Quantum Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation