2002
DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200241030-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the Absolute Bioavailability of Rivastigmine in Patients with Mild to Moderate Dementia of the Alzheimer???s Type

Abstract: A noncompartmental approach and a compartmental approach based on a population pharmacokinetic model with Michaelis-Menten elimination yielded comparable values, 71.7% and 60.2% respectively, for the absolute bioavailability of a single 6 mg oral dose of rivastigmine. Comparison with previous studies confirmed that the oral form of the drug exhibits increased bioavailability with increasing dose, consistent with its nonlinear pharmacokinetics..

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings following patch application similarly showed nonlinear pharmacokinetics consistent with the observation that bioavailability of rivastigmine increases with rising doses and confirmed earlier findings with the patch 12 . This novel rivastigmine patch formulation demonstrated a much flatter rivastigmine concentration‐time profile compared with the capsule formulation 21 . The fluctuation between maximum (C max ) and minimum (C min ) concentrations, as expressed by the ratio C max /C min , was markedly lower with the patch (around 1.6–2.0 in white and 1.5–1.6 in Japanese participants) than that previously observed with the oral capsule formulation (ratio = 55) 21 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our findings following patch application similarly showed nonlinear pharmacokinetics consistent with the observation that bioavailability of rivastigmine increases with rising doses and confirmed earlier findings with the patch 12 . This novel rivastigmine patch formulation demonstrated a much flatter rivastigmine concentration‐time profile compared with the capsule formulation 21 . The fluctuation between maximum (C max ) and minimum (C min ) concentrations, as expressed by the ratio C max /C min , was markedly lower with the patch (around 1.6–2.0 in white and 1.5–1.6 in Japanese participants) than that previously observed with the oral capsule formulation (ratio = 55) 21 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Thus, maximum plasma drug concentration (C max ) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) increase more than proportionally with an increasing dose, whereas they are low at low dose [2]. Also rivastigmine has a short plasma half-life, so a sensitive bioanalytical method, which can quantify rivastigmine at sub-nanogram level, is required for the determination of pharmacokinetic parameters of rivastigmine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The techniques used in these methods include LC-MS/MS [1,3] and GC-MS detection [2,[4][5][6]. Although these assays are sufficiently sensitive, these methods require laborious extraction procedures like liquid-liquid extraction or solid-phase microextraction involving time-consuming and error-prone solvent evaporation and reconstitution steps and long run time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, MRS measurements have been shown to be a predictor of cognitive scores at follow-up in AD, but not in vascular dementia (Wahlund et al 2000). Furthermore, few controlled studies have used MRS to monitor treatment effects of muscarinic agonists and AchE inhibitors, demonstrating N -acetylaspartate measured by MRS combined with hippocampal volumetry, to provide a highly useful surrogate marker of AD progression in trials of neuroprotective agents (Hossain et al 2002; Krishnan et al 2003). …”
Section: The State-of-the-art-imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%