2017
DOI: 10.9790/0853-1601074652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Stature from Percutaneous Length of Ulna and Tibia in Medical Students of Nagaland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Length of ulna has been used to estimate the height of the individual and has been observed to be more consistent than long bones of the lower limbs [1][2]. Various researchers have proposed a linear regression of height with the percutaneous length of the ulna of the same person [6]. Estimating the height from hand length is of significant practical importance in anthropometry and inquiries of medico-legal cases [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Length of ulna has been used to estimate the height of the individual and has been observed to be more consistent than long bones of the lower limbs [1][2]. Various researchers have proposed a linear regression of height with the percutaneous length of the ulna of the same person [6]. Estimating the height from hand length is of significant practical importance in anthropometry and inquiries of medico-legal cases [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Sudanese people, Ahmed [42] developed equations using upper arm length, ulnar length, wrist breadth, hand length, hand breadth, and hand length and reported an estimation error of 4.31-5.85 cm in males and 3.97-5.43 cm in females. In another study, Lemtur et al [43] examined the relation of stature with the ulnar length and tibia length in India and reported that the standard error of estimation ranged from 3.73 to 4 cm in males and 2.94 to 3.37 cm in females. Torimitsu et al [29] also considered the ulnar length and radial length to estimate the stature in a Japanese population where the stature prediction ranged from 4.09 to 4.58 cm in males and 4.21-4.58 cm in females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 as this measurement is known to have a strong correlation with body height. We used the relation S = 101.85 + 1.81 x PCTL ±3.73 for male and S = 77.86 + 2.36 x PCTL ±2.94 for female (where S = stature and PCTL = Percutaneous tibial length) (Lemtur et al, 2017). For a tibial length of 35 cm, the stature of Morph.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%