2016
DOI: 10.12816/0026461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Stature from Hand Measurements and Handprints in a Sample of Saudi Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
7
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(40 reference statements)
3
7
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The current research recorded lower SEE in handprints dimensions in females than males (Table 5), this correspond with the values of the coefficient of determination (R2) seen in Table 5 for multiple equations and Graphs 1-8 for simple equations which conforms with the data of Krishan et al [9] among Panjab Medical students in India, the work of Sangeeta et al [11] on Rajasthan population, that of Paulis [13] in an Egyptian population and that of Kornieieva & Elelemi [12] in a Sample of Saudi Population which all reconstructed Stature from Handprints parameters and found contrasting values for Pearson correlation coefficient (r), coefficient of determination (R2) and standard error of estimate (SEE) between stature and handprint parameters which is a pointer that no two populations have the same values for body parameters. These variations further buttress the fact that every region needs a population-specific regression equation for prediction of stature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The current research recorded lower SEE in handprints dimensions in females than males (Table 5), this correspond with the values of the coefficient of determination (R2) seen in Table 5 for multiple equations and Graphs 1-8 for simple equations which conforms with the data of Krishan et al [9] among Panjab Medical students in India, the work of Sangeeta et al [11] on Rajasthan population, that of Paulis [13] in an Egyptian population and that of Kornieieva & Elelemi [12] in a Sample of Saudi Population which all reconstructed Stature from Handprints parameters and found contrasting values for Pearson correlation coefficient (r), coefficient of determination (R2) and standard error of estimate (SEE) between stature and handprint parameters which is a pointer that no two populations have the same values for body parameters. These variations further buttress the fact that every region needs a population-specific regression equation for prediction of stature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Sexual dimorphism was observed with higher values consistently recorded in male cases than their female counterpart in all the measured parameters for both left and right hand sides (Table 1 & 2). This results did not record exact values for left and right hand sides but when subjected to paired sample t-test, bilateral handprints asymmetry were not statistically significant which contradict the findings of Ishak et al [3], Krishan et al [9] and Kornieieva & Elelemi [12] on handprints variables which reported significant statistical (p<0.05) difference between left and right handprint values in both sexes. Thus, Kornieieva & Elelemi [12] further proposed that hand dominance plays a vital role in bilateral limb asymmetry.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations