2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of snow depth from passive microwave brightness temperature data in forest regions of northeast China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
100
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the soil temperature and the land type were the main causes of errors in the QTP, the instant snow could not be detected for the extremely low scattering of small grain size. Therefore, accurately monitoring the snow depth using passive microwave requires a priori knowledge of snow characteristics Che et al, 2016;Huang et al, 2012;Tedesco and Narvekar, 2010). In this study, 16 % of snow depths greater than 10 cm observed at meteorological stations were misclassified as snow-free grids by AMSR-E.…”
Section: Snow Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although the soil temperature and the land type were the main causes of errors in the QTP, the instant snow could not be detected for the extremely low scattering of small grain size. Therefore, accurately monitoring the snow depth using passive microwave requires a priori knowledge of snow characteristics Che et al, 2016;Huang et al, 2012;Tedesco and Narvekar, 2010). In this study, 16 % of snow depths greater than 10 cm observed at meteorological stations were misclassified as snow-free grids by AMSR-E.…”
Section: Snow Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NASA snow water equivalent product derived from Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for Earth Observing System (AMSR-E) generally tends to underestimate snow depth in North America (Tedesco and Narvekar, 2010) when compared with World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and Snow Data Assimilation System (SNODAS) but overestimate in northwest and northeast of China Che et al, 2016) when compared with meteorological station and field work observations. These authors pointed out that the errors primarily came from the spatiotemporal variability of grain size and forest cover.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To increase the spatial coverage of snow depth, researchers have used different instruments (e.g., lidar, airborne laser scanning, and unmanned aerial systems) (Hopkinson et al, 2004;Grünewald and Lehning, 2013;Bühler et al, 2016) or developed and/or improved passive microwave snow algorithms (Foster et al, 1997;Derksen et al, 2003;Grippaa et al, 2004;Che et al, 2016). Although snow depth and SWE obtained from passive microwave satellite remote sensing could mitigate regional deficiency of in situ snow depth measurements, they have low spatial resolution (25 km × 25 km), and the accuracy is always affected by underlying surface conditions and algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%