2017
DOI: 10.5194/tc-11-1933-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of snow cover and snow depth on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau derived from passive microwave remote sensing

Abstract: Abstract. Snow cover on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP) plays a significant role in the global climate system and is an important water resource for rivers in the high-elevation region of Asia. At present, passive microwave (PMW) remote sensing data are the only efficient way to monitor temporal and spatial variations in snow depth at large scale. However, existing snow depth products show the largest uncertainties across the QTP. In this study, MODIS fractional snow cover product, point, line and intense sa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the large uncertainties in snow depth retrieval are associated with forest cover in Northeast China, which agrees with the studies by (Cai et al, 2017;Roy et al, 2014;. The RMSE in the QTP and South China is also large due to patchy, shallow and wet snow (Dai et al, 2017(Dai et al, , 2018Yang et al, 2015). Figure 5c shows that it tends to overestimate snow depth over shallow snow areas, especially in the QTP and South China.…”
Section: Rf Model Training and Validationsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the large uncertainties in snow depth retrieval are associated with forest cover in Northeast China, which agrees with the studies by (Cai et al, 2017;Roy et al, 2014;. The RMSE in the QTP and South China is also large due to patchy, shallow and wet snow (Dai et al, 2017(Dai et al, , 2018Yang et al, 2015). Figure 5c shows that it tends to overestimate snow depth over shallow snow areas, especially in the QTP and South China.…”
Section: Rf Model Training and Validationsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Along with the seasonal evolution, the snow particle grows (~2 mm), and the snowpack becomes denser (200~400 kg m -3 ), which causes stronger scattering effects. In situ measurements show that the snow cover is shallow in the QTP, even less than 5 cm, which results in patchy snow cover (Dai et al, 2017). However, the snow depth was overestimated, which may be due to the following reasons.…”
Section: Rf Model Training and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies pointed out that passive microwave remote sensing has a limited ability to detect wet snow during the snow melt season, which may underestimate the D d [87][88][89][90]. Meanwhile, misclassification and error in deriving snow cover were attributed to relatively coarse spatial resolution, as well as the complexity of snow characteristics and topography [91][92][93][94]. Combined with optical remote sensing, passive microwave remote sensing and a land surface model can effectively improve the monitoring accuracy of snow phenology and snow depth [95].…”
Section: Limitation and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, the Tb and Tb biases in QTP are smaller and more stable than observations in XJ and NE, except at a high frequency, 85 or 91 GHz. The main reason is that the air temperature creates a slight variation due to the high elevation [13,50,51]. For the 19 GHz channel, the differences mostly range from -2 to +2 K, and from -5 to +5 K in NE.…”
Section: Comparison Between Ssm/i and Ssmis Brightness Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second focus point is the effect of snow microstructure on its microwave signature. Snow layers have typically distinct grain size, grain type, density, hardness, and wetness, which affects the scattering of microwave radiation from dry snow [5,6,[11][12][13]. Even small changes in snow microstructure, such as snow grain, modify the measured Tb notably [60].…”
Section: The Biases In Different Climatological Snow Classesmentioning
confidence: 99%