1992
DOI: 10.1029/92jd01626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of sensible heat flux from remotely sensed canopy temperatures

Abstract: Temperatures of tallgrass prairie vegetation were measured with infrared thermometers (IRT) at different view zenith and azimuth angles. The optimum IRT view zenith angle for estimating sensible heat fluxes (H) was determined by comparing H estimated with eddy correlation and/or Bowen ratio techniques to H calculated by a method suggested by Hatfield et al. (1984). For wind speeds of 5 m s−1 or greater, H estimated with surface temperatures measured at a 0° or 20° view zenith angle gave the best agreement, but… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(13) are not uniquely defined by surface roughness parameters. In addition to experimental evidence (e.g., [124,125]), Kustas et al [58] using a complex soil-vegetation-atmosphere-transfer (SVAT) model (Cupid [79]) have shown the lack of a unique relationship between T R ðhÞ and the ''aerodynamic'' surface temperature, T 0 .…”
Section: Evapotranspirationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(13) are not uniquely defined by surface roughness parameters. In addition to experimental evidence (e.g., [124,125]), Kustas et al [58] using a complex soil-vegetation-atmosphere-transfer (SVAT) model (Cupid [79]) have shown the lack of a unique relationship between T R ðhÞ and the ''aerodynamic'' surface temperature, T 0 .…”
Section: Evapotranspirationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as evidence from many previous studies, both the resistances in Equation 9 and consequently the parameterization in Equation 11 are not uniquely defined by surface roughness parameters. In addition to experimental evidence (e.g., Vining and Blad, 1992;Verhoef et al, 1997), Kustas et al (2003), using a complex soil-vegetation-atmosphere-transfer (SVAT) model (Cupid; Norman and Campbell, 1983), have shown the lack of a unique relationship between T R (u) and the so-called "aerodynamic" surface temperature, T O , (T O is the temperature satisfying Equation 9 with traditional expressions for the resistances; see Norman and Becker (1995)). An alternative approach recently proposed considers the soil and vegetation contribution to the total or composite heat fluxes and soil and vegetation temperatures to the radiometric temperature measurements in a so-called "Two-Source" Modeling (TSM) scheme .…”
Section: Remote Sensing Of Hydrometeorological Fluxes Evapotranspirationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. The sensible heat flux over a vegetation surface is overestimated under unstable conditions in the daytime, when a TIR surface temperature measured in the near nadir angle is substituted for the bulk formulation (Vining and Blad 1992;Matsushima and Kondo 1997). 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%