2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of seismic building structural types using multi-sensor remote sensing and machine learning techniques

Abstract: Detailed information about seismic building structural types (SBSTs) is crucial for accurate earthquake vulnerability and risk modeling as it reflects the main load-bearing structures of buildings and, thus, the behavior under seismic load. However, for numerous urban areas in earthquake prone regions this information is mostly outdated, unavailable, or simply not existent. To this purpose, we present an effective approach to estimate SBSTs by combining scarce in situ observations, multi-sensor remote sensing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, feature selection may attenuate the over-fitting problem in multivariate classification methods (Geiß et al, 2015). Feature selection methods can be grouped into three categories; wrappers, embedded, and filters (Guyon et al, 2008).…”
Section: Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, feature selection may attenuate the over-fitting problem in multivariate classification methods (Geiß et al, 2015). Feature selection methods can be grouped into three categories; wrappers, embedded, and filters (Guyon et al, 2008).…”
Section: Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The class determina- tion is based on a majority votes fashion. RF has proven to be an accurate and robust classification and regression approach, even on noisy data (Geiß et al, 2015).…”
Section: Machine Learning Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Taubenböck (2015) characterize the built environment with remote sensing data and retrieve specific fragility functions or damage probability matrices, respectively, for designated building types. In contrast to that, e.g., Borfecchia et al (2010), and Geiß et al (2014Geiß et al ( , 2015 combine limited in situ ground truth building inventory data with features from remote sensing and use techniques of statistical inference for a complete labelling of the residual building inventory according to relevant vulnerability levels. Similar methodological principles were exploited by Wieland et al (2012), Pittore and Wieland (2013), and Geiß et al (2016) to assess seismic vulnerability on an aggregated spatial level to allow for covering larger areas.…”
Section: Third Phase: Methodological Elaboration Of Specific Aspects mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tobia Lakes et al [23] proposed an effectiveapproach to estimate SBSTs (seismic building structural types) by combining scarce in situ observations, multi-sensor remote sensingdata and machine learning techniques.Experimental outcomes obtained fora representative study area and evaluate the capacities of the exhibited approach.It confirm its great potential for a reliable area-wide estimation of SBSTs andan effective earthquake loss modeling based on remote sensing, which ought to be additionally investigated in future research exercises.The drawback is the high algorithmic complexity and extensive memory requirements of the required quadratic programming in large-scale tasks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%