Summary:The fracturing behavior of polymers and polymeric composites is of great interest in the scientific and application community. Especially in the case of silicatelayered nanocomposites the influence of fillers on the fracturing behavior is still fairly unclear. Fractures of semicrystalline polymers are accompanied by various processes of which shearing and cavitations are the most common ones. Nanocomposite deformation due to the delamination of fillers seems to be the most practical way leading to fractures with relatively low strains. With the method of scanning small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and wide angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD) it is possible to combine information on the structural details with the position on the sample, with the actual position resolution of the investigation being defined by the size of the Xray beam used to scan the sample. By means of the application of synchrotron radiation it is nowadays possible to adjust the actual beam size to the dimensions of the region of interest, which is why it is an adequate tool for studying the deformation region near a crack tip. In a native polypropylene sample, the fracturing process was accompanied by shear yielding as well as lamellae fragmentation and reorienting. In the highly deformed material near the crack tip fibrillated material could be found. However, in the polymeric nanocomposites (PNC) shearing, lamellae fragmentation, and fibrillation were hindered by the filler due to which the material did not have so much freedom to dissipate energy and fractures occurred much earlier. In this paper the comparison of a PNC and its native polymer is to provide an overview of the different deformation mechanism and the structural details around the crack tip.