2021
DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_00870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Peer Effects in Endogenous Social Networks: Control Function Approach

Abstract: We propose methods of estimating the linear-in-means model of peer effects in which the peer group, defined by a social network, is endogenous in the outcome equation for peer effects. Endogeneity is due to unobservable individual characteristics that inuence both link formation in the network and the outcome of interest. We propose two estimators of the peer effect equation that control for the endogeneity of the social connections using a control function approach. We leave the functional form of the control… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our model, agents make decisions on links g ij as well as effort y i , taking into account the direct utility from links, the direct utility from effort, and the social utility. In the social interaction models with endogenous networks (see, e.g., Auerbach, 2019;Johnsson and Moon, 2019), links are assumed to be pairwise independent (conditional on observed and unobserved individual attributes).…”
Section: Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our model, agents make decisions on links g ij as well as effort y i , taking into account the direct utility from links, the direct utility from effort, and the social utility. In the social interaction models with endogenous networks (see, e.g., Auerbach, 2019;Johnsson and Moon, 2019), links are assumed to be pairwise independent (conditional on observed and unobserved individual attributes).…”
Section: Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our model, links are interdependent with externalities given by the congestion and cyclic triangle effects in a i (g, X). Furthermore, Auerbach (2019) and Johnsson and Moon (2019) assume actions depend on links but not the other way around (conditional on observed and unobserved individual attributes). In our model, the social utility component in Equation…”
Section: Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, unobservables could still cause G to be endogenous. To deal with this, I turn to a recently developed estimator for peer effects by Johnsson and Moon (2015). This is a semiparametric control function approach, which estimates a first step network formation model developed in Graham (2017) and then uses information from the first step to estimate peer effects controlling for endogenous network formation.…”
Section: Identifying Peer Effects With Friendship Network Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this, I use a two-step procedure, estimating a network formation model developed by Graham (2017) in a first step. In the second step, I implement a recently developed semiparametric estimator in the outcome equation, using information from the network formation model to correct for bias from the network endogeneity (Johnsson and Moon 2015). This approach allows for an unobservable, individual fixed effect in the choice of friendship between two dyads (adolescents) that is also correlated with attitudes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%