2010
DOI: 10.1177/0734904110373890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Peak Heat Release Rate of a Forest Fuel Bed in Outdoor Laboratory Conditions

Abstract: Experimental tests were carried out with an adapted bench-scale mass loss calorimeter (MLC) and also in an outdoor wind tunnel to estimate the heat release rate (HRR) of a forest fuel bed. The MLC apparatus uses a calibrated thermopile to quantify the HRR, as an alternative to the classical measurement of oxygen consumption due to combustion. Additional calibration of thermocouples to measure gas temperatures enabled estimation of HRR in experimental burnings conducted in the wind tunnel. The results showed a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…collected as bulk particles, and reconstructed in the laboratory after particle sorting[45]) and tested immediately after construction. Fast and easy collection, the possibility of fuel standardisation, (e.g., testing samples with standardised mass[18,68,71], height or volume [34,45,52], composition [27,48,7174]) and particle manipulation [25,28], as well as the ability to construct large litter beds (e.g.,[51]) can be considered as advantages of constructed samples. Sampling of aged particles and the subsequent construction of the fuel bed in the laboratory accounts for particle fragmentation [35] and aging induced chemical changes of the fuels [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…collected as bulk particles, and reconstructed in the laboratory after particle sorting[45]) and tested immediately after construction. Fast and easy collection, the possibility of fuel standardisation, (e.g., testing samples with standardised mass[18,68,71], height or volume [34,45,52], composition [27,48,7174]) and particle manipulation [25,28], as well as the ability to construct large litter beds (e.g.,[51]) can be considered as advantages of constructed samples. Sampling of aged particles and the subsequent construction of the fuel bed in the laboratory accounts for particle fragmentation [35] and aging induced chemical changes of the fuels [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within each treatment, 5 samples per species were used for testing fire behaviour and 3 for taking subsamples for morphological measurements. Samples assigned to the fresh treatment were prepared using the common approach of a sample being prepared just prior to the testing (e.g.,[18,25,28,51,52]). Fresh treatment samples were prepared by dropping a small amount of leaves at one time into the testing cage and consequently gently shaking the testing cage to ensure uniform distribution of the litter inside of the cage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most authors broadly define flammability as the capacity of a material to ignite and sustain a fire, but the components measured to provide an assessment of flammability vary across authors and disciplines (e.g. Anderson 1970;Martin et al 1994;Liodakis et al 2002;Gill and Zylstra 2005;White and Zipperer 2010;Jaureguiberry et al 2011;Madrigal et al 2011;Pausas and Moreira 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whole plants were tested in an outdoor wind tunnel (see Madrigal et al 2011b for details). Flammability parameters were analysed in 1-and 5-year-old shrubs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%