The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11604-010-0432-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of organs doses and radiation-induced secondary cancer risk from scattered photons for conventional radiation therapy of nasopharynx: a Monte Carlo study

Abstract: Our results regarding the effective dose and cancer risk are in agreement with previously published experimental results on conventional radiation therapy. Further investigation on patients' out-of-field dose to provide more knowledge on various radiotherapy techniques is suggested.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of the patient, which was the most significant source of scattered radiation was neglected [1419]. On the other hand, some previous works focused on detailed simulation of the human phantom with the isocenter of a Linac, but over-simplified details in the treatment room such as the maze, primary and secondary shielding (e.g., refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of the patient, which was the most significant source of scattered radiation was neglected [1419]. On the other hand, some previous works focused on detailed simulation of the human phantom with the isocenter of a Linac, but over-simplified details in the treatment room such as the maze, primary and secondary shielding (e.g., refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These agree with the 0.25 Sv in the current study within the uncertainties. 26 An estimate of the uncertainty due to variations in patient anatomy was calculated by calculating the dose for each patient and taking the standard deviation of the dose for each organ-treatment site pair. Uncertainties (at the level of two standard deviations) in dose for individual organs ranged from 10% to 38%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesbahi et al estimated the organ doses from scattered photons for 60Co, 6 MV, and 9 MV irradiations. In agreement with our findings, the 60Co machine showed the highest out‐of‐field dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A smaller planning target volume (PTV) will lead to a sparing of the organs at risk. Multiple studies of imaging [6][7][8][9][10] and therapeutic dose [11][12][13] were published. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to compare the out-of-field dose of two treatment machines, one equipped with an ionizing and one with a nonionizing imaging device.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%