2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2007.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of near-field characteristics of tsunami generation by submarine landslide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas P was developed for subaerial landslide tsunamis (impulse waves), it does not apply to submarine landslide tsunamis [5,9,25,[39][40][41]. Although some slide parameters are significant for both phenomena, other parameters not considered in P, including the initial slide submergence, are only relevant for underwater landslide tsunamis.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas P was developed for subaerial landslide tsunamis (impulse waves), it does not apply to submarine landslide tsunamis [5,9,25,[39][40][41]. Although some slide parameters are significant for both phenomena, other parameters not considered in P, including the initial slide submergence, are only relevant for underwater landslide tsunamis.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details of the experimental setup are provided in [5,12] and a brief description is also provided here. Two inclined planes with adjustable slope from 15 to 60 degrees were made for sliding down solid blocks or sliding materials and another one for observation of run-up of slide-generated waves.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The runup on an opposing hill slope from the offshore propagating waves generated by landslides has been studied in two-dimensional physical models [Fritz et al, 2001;Ataie-Ashtiani and Najafi-Jilani, 2008;Ataie-Ashtiani and Nik-Khah, 2008;Najafi-Jilani and Ataie-Ashtiani, 2008;Fritz et al, 2009] and in a threedimensional scaled physical model of Sunnylvsfjorden branch of Storfjorden, Norway [Harbitz et al, 2014;Lindstrøm et al, 2014]. Opposing hill slope runup has been investigated in the laboratory and analytically for incident solitary waves [Hall and Watts, 1953;Kishi and Saeki, 1966;Camfield and Street, 1969;Synolakis, 1987;Liu et al, 1995;Madsen and Sch€ affer, 2010;Saelevik et al, 2013], cnoidal waves [Synolakis et al, 1988;Madsen and Sch€ affer, 2010;Chan and Liu, 2012], and periodic waves [Carrier and Greenspan, 1958;Keller and Keller, 1964;Guza and Thornton, 1982;Holman, 1986;Kanoglu and Synolakis, 1998;Madsen and Sch€ affer, 2010].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%