1972
DOI: 10.2307/2528631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Microbial Viability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The viability of individual organisms was estimated from the cluster viability and the cluster size distribution by using formulae derived on the basis that dead organisms were randomly distributed through clusters of all sizes (Thomas, Doughty, Fletcher & Robertson, 1972). The cluster-size distribution, defined as the proportion of organisms in clusters of different sizes, was determined by examining slide cultures before growth of the organisms had occurred.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The viability of individual organisms was estimated from the cluster viability and the cluster size distribution by using formulae derived on the basis that dead organisms were randomly distributed through clusters of all sizes (Thomas, Doughty, Fletcher & Robertson, 1972). The cluster-size distribution, defined as the proportion of organisms in clusters of different sizes, was determined by examining slide cultures before growth of the organisms had occurred.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organisms suspended in phosphate buffer were incubated at 30 "C with shaking for 131 h. The means and standard errors of results of single analyses on each of six flasks are presented. Viability of individual organisms was estimated from the cluster viability by using formulae(Thomas et al 1972). Dry wt (M); viable organisms (a); total organisms (0).Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%