2014
DOI: 10.2478/jos-2014-0049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Mean Squared Error of X-11-ARIMA and Other Estimators of Time Series Components

Abstract: This article considers the familiar but very important problem of how to estimate the mean squared error (MSE) of seasonally adjusted and trend estimators produced by X-11-ARIMA or other decomposition methods. The MSE estimators are obtained by defining the unknown target components such as the trend and seasonal effects to be the hypothetical X-11 estimates of them that would be obtained if there were no sampling errors and the series were sufficiently long to allow the use of the symmetric filters embedded i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparisons between different Box-Jenkins time series models can be easily found in the literature [28][29][30][31], but there are very few works comparing the results of different parameter estimation methods. ML and LS were compared in [32] to obtain an ARIMA model to predict the gold price.…”
Section: Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons between different Box-Jenkins time series models can be easily found in the literature [28][29][30][31], but there are very few works comparing the results of different parameter estimation methods. ML and LS were compared in [32] to obtain an ARIMA model to predict the gold price.…”
Section: Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MSE quantifies the average squared difference between the predicted and observed values. serving as a common metric for assessing the accuracy of regression models 33 . Lower MSE values indicate better model performance, suggesting closer alignment between predictions and actual values 34 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…serving as a common metric for assessing the accuracy of regression models. 33 Lower MSE values indicate better model performance, suggesting closer alignment between predictions and actual values. 34 MSE is particularly useful when you want to penalize larger prediction errors more severely, as it squares the differences.…”
Section: Mean Squared Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same way as before, this makes the seasonal adjustment less certain just at the moment that the series are most under scrutiny. Although the methodology for assessing the mean squared error accounting for seasonal adjustment has been developed [9], it does not seem to have been applied to consider the changes in quality of seasonal adjustment during recessions.…”
Section: Some Examples Of Susceptible Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%