2013
DOI: 10.5571/synth.6.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of legible font size for elderly people

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, other letter features (font type and complexity) were not significantly related to the aging effect on legible-contrast threshold. This indicates that the aging effect on minimum legible font size at 100% contrast condition (Sagawa & Kurakata, 2013) can be applied to the aging difference into the low contrast letter condition.…”
Section: Effects Of Aging On Legible-contrastmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, other letter features (font type and complexity) were not significantly related to the aging effect on legible-contrast threshold. This indicates that the aging effect on minimum legible font size at 100% contrast condition (Sagawa & Kurakata, 2013) can be applied to the aging difference into the low contrast letter condition.…”
Section: Effects Of Aging On Legible-contrastmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…There are several previous legible-size studies without consideration of a letter contrast (Fozard, 1990;Sagawa & Kurakata, 2013;Sagawa et al, 2002). For example, Sagawa and Kurakata (2013) measured the aging effect on minimum legible letter size.…”
Section: Effects Of Aging On Legible-contrastmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We avoided putting too many complicated elements on the screen and only essential elements were displayed. The font or object size for key elements was determined to make it possible for at least 95% of the older population in Korea to read and recognize them ( 56 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%