2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-583x(03)01370-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of keV submicron ion beam width using a knife-edge method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard way of measuring an electron beam profile is via edge resolution analysis where signal strength is collected as the electron beam scans along an atomically sharp edge (Rishton, 1984). Unfortunately, this method is problematic for focused ion beams because the ion beam will sputter away the sharp edge as it scans across it, skewing the detected signal (Harriott, 1990; Ishii et al, 2003; Postek et al, 2010). Another way to measure beam profile is to sputter ion beam spot-sized holes, called beam burns, into a diagnostic material such as Si (Tan et al, 2012), fill the beam burn with deposition, use the FIB to cut a cross-section of the beam burn, and then measure its profile in cross section in the FIB or TEM (Greenzweig et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard way of measuring an electron beam profile is via edge resolution analysis where signal strength is collected as the electron beam scans along an atomically sharp edge (Rishton, 1984). Unfortunately, this method is problematic for focused ion beams because the ion beam will sputter away the sharp edge as it scans across it, skewing the detected signal (Harriott, 1990; Ishii et al, 2003; Postek et al, 2010). Another way to measure beam profile is to sputter ion beam spot-sized holes, called beam burns, into a diagnostic material such as Si (Tan et al, 2012), fill the beam burn with deposition, use the FIB to cut a cross-section of the beam burn, and then measure its profile in cross section in the FIB or TEM (Greenzweig et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Line scans were performed perpendicular to the ion beam axis. Scanning the primary ion beam along a straight edge object allows the beam diameter to be measured, provided that the measurement step, which is defined by the pixel size, is much smaller …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scanning the primary ion beam along a straight edge object allows the beam diameter to be measured, provided that the measurement step, which is defined by the pixel size, is much smaller. [49,50] Mass spectrometry imaging On a rat cerebellum section, images in both negative and positive ion mode were acquired to evaluate each acquisition mode. The desired result is to distinguish Purkinje cells, which are very small structures present in the tissue.…”
Section: Tof-simsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, knife-edge (Ishii et al, 2003;Wright et al, 1992) and charge-coupled device (CCD) techniques are used to measure beam widths. Knife edge techniques are capable of achieving high resolution depending on the edge shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%