2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2008.00967.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of glomerular filtration rate in South Asian healthy adult kidney donors

Abstract: The CG GFR equation was better than other equations to estimate GFR in South Asian healthy renal donors. We propose a new equation derived from the regression model in our study population to estimate GFR in a South Asian healthy adult population.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…21 Srinivas et al, evaluated the performance of serum creatinine based equations to estimate GFR in South Asian healthy renal donors and found that the mean GFR was 95.5±11.6 ml/min. 22 Our study too is comparable with earlier reports and the mean eGFR by CG and MDRD equations was found to be 91.05±15.04 and 86.43±13.61 respectively.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…21 Srinivas et al, evaluated the performance of serum creatinine based equations to estimate GFR in South Asian healthy renal donors and found that the mean GFR was 95.5±11.6 ml/min. 22 Our study too is comparable with earlier reports and the mean eGFR by CG and MDRD equations was found to be 91.05±15.04 and 86.43±13.61 respectively.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results supported those of Srinivas et al, whose study compared eGFR MDRD and eGFR mC-G with GFR measured by 99mTc-DTPA renal clearance in 599 renal donors; this study demonstrated that eGFR MDRD performed better in terms of global bias, precision, correlation and accuracy than eGFR mC-G . 21 Regarding the validity among studied groups, our study showed that eGFR MDRD had a higher validity than either eGFR C-G or eGFR mC-G in males, those with DM, individuals ≥70 years of age and those who were obese. The eGFR mC-G had higher validity in diabetics, males and those ≥70 years of age than eGFR C-G ; however, in the obese subjects, eGFR mC-G was more sensitive but had less specificity, PPV, NPV and TA than eGFR C-G .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Le dé veloppement de la formule de la Mayo Clinic é tait destiné à amé liorer les performances pré dictives dans cette population, inté grant une forte proportion de donneurs vivants potentiels (580 sur un total de 900 patients) [14]. Cependant, deux é tudes tendent à montrer une surestimation importante du DFG dans cette population par cette formule [64,65].…”
Section: Formules D'estimation Du Dfg Et E´pide´miologie De La Maladiunclassified