2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.11.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of daily PM10 concentrations in Italy (2006–2012) using finely resolved satellite data, land use variables and meteorology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
78
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This tendency was reduced by the choice of the least squares loss function as describes in chapter 2.5.3 but likely still continues to affect the model accuracy. The model performance is comparable to similar studies, also in its underestimation of PM (Hu et al, ; Grange et al, ; Stafoggia et al, ; Zhang et al, ). Tenfold random train/test splits were conducted, resulting in 10 models.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This tendency was reduced by the choice of the least squares loss function as describes in chapter 2.5.3 but likely still continues to affect the model accuracy. The model performance is comparable to similar studies, also in its underestimation of PM (Hu et al, ; Grange et al, ; Stafoggia et al, ; Zhang et al, ). Tenfold random train/test splits were conducted, resulting in 10 models.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The data set has been successfully used in previous air quality studies (cf. Chen et al, ; Stafoggia et al, ; Zheng et al, ). To capture regional transport of particles, ERA‐Interim reanalysis wind components (m/s) in east‐west and north‐south direction (10 m height) are used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, Chen et al (2017) reported an improvement in the leaf area index (LAI) retrievals with the MODIS LAI/FPAR algorithm when using MAIAC instead of standard MODIS MOD09 input. A high accuracy, high 1 km spatial resolution and high retrieval coverage made MAIAC aerosol optical depth (AOD) a focus of numerous air quality studies, e.g., Chudnovsky et al (2013), Kloog et al (2014), Just et al (2015), Di et al (2016), Stafoggia et al (2016), Tang et al (2017) and Xiao et al (2017) to name a few. Currently published validation studies (Martins et al, 2017;Superczynski et al, 2017) show a high MAIAC AOD accuracy over American continents and an improved accuracy and coverage over North America compared to the operational VIIRS algorithm (Superczynski et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%