Abstract:In spin based quantum dot arrays, material or fabrication imprecisions affect the behaviour of the device, which must be taken into account when controlling it. This requires measuring the shape of specific convex polytopes. We present an algorithm that automatically discovers count, shape and size of the facets of a convex polytope from measurements by alternating a phase of model-fitting with a phase of querying new measurements, based on the fitted model. We evaluate the algorithm on simulated polytopes and… Show more
“…The assumption of linear transitions is strong, as it is unlikely that the device has perfectly linear boundaries between ground-states. However, prior work [9] has already shown in practical application that at least some small devices have coulomb diamonds that are sufficiently linear to fit a convex polytope to them, showing that the strategy has the potential to become practical on some devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to our approach, the approach in [9] used much weaker assumptions on the shape of the polytope, which affects computation time. In their results, computing a polytope for a 2x2 array took 4 hours, while our approach takes less than 1h on a 4x4 array (scenario S 5 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, since the number of control voltages grows linearly with the number of quantum dots, hand-tuning their values becomes more and more challenging due to cross-talk between the dots. Only recently did we see the emergence of automatic tuning algorithms, often implemented using machinelearning [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. These approaches were used only for small arrays, and still lag behind the results achievable via manual tuning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this, we only rely on the use of line scans to detect the nearest transition in a chosen direction, and use a machine-learning model to estimate transitions from measurements. Compared to previous works on the same tuning step [8,9], we will also make use of explicit knowledge of the underlying physics to constrain the problem to make the algorithm more efficient. We restrict ourselves to quantum dot devices described by the constant interaction model [13], appropriate for instance for arrays of gate-controlled spin qubits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our goal is to answer the question whether the tuning problem of identifying desired single-and multi-electron transitions is reliably possible for large-devices that follow the constant-interaction model exactly. This is a different starting point than the work in [9] that aimed to develop a practical algorithm that works on small devices that do not require exact adherence to the constant interaction model, but ultimately does not scale to the devices considered in this work.…”
We introduce an algorithm that is able to find the facets of Coulomb diamonds in quantum dot arrays. We simulate these arrays using the constant-interaction model, and rely only on one-dimensional raster scans (rays) to learn a model of the device using regularized maximum likelihood estimation. This allows us to determine, for a given charge state of the device, which transitions exist and what the compensated gate voltages for these are. For smaller devices the simulator can also be used to compute the exact boundaries of the Coulomb diamonds, which we use to assess that our algorithm correctly finds the vast majority of transitions with high precision.
“…The assumption of linear transitions is strong, as it is unlikely that the device has perfectly linear boundaries between ground-states. However, prior work [9] has already shown in practical application that at least some small devices have coulomb diamonds that are sufficiently linear to fit a convex polytope to them, showing that the strategy has the potential to become practical on some devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to our approach, the approach in [9] used much weaker assumptions on the shape of the polytope, which affects computation time. In their results, computing a polytope for a 2x2 array took 4 hours, while our approach takes less than 1h on a 4x4 array (scenario S 5 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, since the number of control voltages grows linearly with the number of quantum dots, hand-tuning their values becomes more and more challenging due to cross-talk between the dots. Only recently did we see the emergence of automatic tuning algorithms, often implemented using machinelearning [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. These approaches were used only for small arrays, and still lag behind the results achievable via manual tuning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this, we only rely on the use of line scans to detect the nearest transition in a chosen direction, and use a machine-learning model to estimate transitions from measurements. Compared to previous works on the same tuning step [8,9], we will also make use of explicit knowledge of the underlying physics to constrain the problem to make the algorithm more efficient. We restrict ourselves to quantum dot devices described by the constant interaction model [13], appropriate for instance for arrays of gate-controlled spin qubits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our goal is to answer the question whether the tuning problem of identifying desired single-and multi-electron transitions is reliably possible for large-devices that follow the constant-interaction model exactly. This is a different starting point than the work in [9] that aimed to develop a practical algorithm that works on small devices that do not require exact adherence to the constant interaction model, but ultimately does not scale to the devices considered in this work.…”
We introduce an algorithm that is able to find the facets of Coulomb diamonds in quantum dot arrays. We simulate these arrays using the constant-interaction model, and rely only on one-dimensional raster scans (rays) to learn a model of the device using regularized maximum likelihood estimation. This allows us to determine, for a given charge state of the device, which transitions exist and what the compensated gate voltages for these are. For smaller devices the simulator can also be used to compute the exact boundaries of the Coulomb diamonds, which we use to assess that our algorithm correctly finds the vast majority of transitions with high precision.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.