2020
DOI: 10.1080/09064702.2020.1746825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of breed and heterosis effects for cow productivity, carcass traits and income in beef × beef and dairy × beef crosses in commercial suckler cow production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of heterosis on carcass metrics regardless of environment, on the other hand, has been widely reported in previous cattle studies (Berry et al., 2018; Wetlesen et al. 2020). Previous studies have, in general, reported positive associations between an increase in heterosis coefficient and both CW and CF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The effect of heterosis on carcass metrics regardless of environment, on the other hand, has been widely reported in previous cattle studies (Berry et al., 2018; Wetlesen et al. 2020). Previous studies have, in general, reported positive associations between an increase in heterosis coefficient and both CW and CF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…(2018) reported positive associations in dairy‐origin animals between an increase in heterosis coefficient and CC, whereas Wetlesen et al. (2020) reported negative associations in both beef‐ and dairy‐origin animals between an increase in heterosis coefficient and CC. The model solution from the regression of CC on heterosis coefficient in the present study (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, nonadditive SNP effects, namely the phenomenon known as heterosis and its underlining molecular mechanism known as dominance, are important considerations, especially in relation to mate selection and the prediction of actual phenotypic performance. The benefits of exploiting heterosis to improve phenotypic performance have been widely reported in previous cattle studies (Berry et al, 2018;Wetlesen et al, 2020). Furthermore, the need to properly adjust for the effects of heterosis in the analysis of crossbred livestock populations is well known (Dickerson, 1973;VanRaden and Sanders, 2003;Williams et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, this adjustment usually involves the inclusion of a pairwise breed heterosis coefficient ( Dickerson, 1973 ; VanRaden and Sanders, 2003 ) in the statistical model ( VanRaden and Sanders, 2003 ; Berry et al, 2019 ; Twomey et al, 2020 ). Regression coefficients from the regression of animal performance on such breed composition-based heterosis coefficients have been widely reported for a variety of traits in cattle, including carcass traits (i.e., the traits of interest to the present study) ( Berry et al, 2018 ; Wetlesen et al, 2020 ; Kenny et al, 2021 ). The use of a heterosis coefficient based on breed composition acts as a proxy for the expected heterozygosity in an animal’s genome ( Dickerson, 1973 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%