2007
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/40/31/005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of bond percolation thresholds on the Archimedean lattices

Abstract: Abstract. We give accurate estimates for the bond percolation critical probabilities on seven Archimedean lattices, for which the critical probabilities are unknown, using an algorithm of Newman and Ziff.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Noting that even this conservative estimate is in significant disagreement with the numerical result of Parviainen [54] (see Table 22) we therefore turn to a different way on constructing the snub hexagonal lattice. The second construction is based on the four-terminal representation shown in Figure 21.…”
Section: Snub Hexagonal Lattice (3 4 6)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Noting that even this conservative estimate is in significant disagreement with the numerical result of Parviainen [54] (see Table 22) we therefore turn to a different way on constructing the snub hexagonal lattice. The second construction is based on the four-terminal representation shown in Figure 21.…”
Section: Snub Hexagonal Lattice (3 4 6)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Note that the cases (n, k) = (2, 0) and (2, 1) now produce different results. The bond threshold of this lattice has not been studied as thoroughly as that of the kagome lattice, and apparently the only high-precision result is Parviainen's [11], p c = 0.676 802 32(63). Our 4 × 4 results are within two standard deviations.…”
Section: (4 8 2 ) Latticementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note also that min-cut data for Et-OCS and Et-OCS(Me) fall along a similar trend (as with the bulk two-dimensional square lattice, the EMA provides only an approximation for similar networks. The square, (3,4,6,4), and (3,6,3,6) two-dimensional Archimedean lattices all have a coordination number of four but the bond percolation thresholds of these lattices are 0.5000, 0.5248, [ 30 ] and 0.5244, [ 31 ] respectively. The accuracy of the EMA in predicting the min-cut and fracture energy scaling for hybrid glasses means that remarkably, the fracture energy scaling with connectivity for amorphous, three-dimensional hybrid glasses can be well predicted to fi rst order by modeling the glass network as a square lattice of Si atoms.…”
Section: Cohesive Fracturementioning
confidence: 99%