2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2014.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of backfat thickness using extracted traits from an automatic 3D optical system in lactating Holstein-Friesian cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Weber et al (2014) the distortion of the cow's surface was introduced as a criterion for changes in body condition. Findings on concave and convex areas of the cow's surfaces could thus be used in the analysis of dairy cows' body condition to describe how sunken relevant areas of the animal's body were.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Weber et al (2014) the distortion of the cow's surface was introduced as a criterion for changes in body condition. Findings on concave and convex areas of the cow's surfaces could thus be used in the analysis of dairy cows' body condition to describe how sunken relevant areas of the animal's body were.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Images of dairy cows' rear views were captured for BCS estimation in Krukowski (2009) with a hand held Time-Of-Flight (TOF) 3D camera while the animals † E-mail: jsalau@tierzucht.uni-kiel.de Animal (2016), 10:9, pp 1513-1524 © The Animal Consortium 2016 doi:10.1017/S1751731116000021 animal 1513 stood still. Additionally, an automated system for backfat thickness (BFT) determination based on a TOF camera mounted in top view position was presented in Salau et al (2014, 1) and Weber et al (2014). The BFT was estimated reaching 0.96 correlation between the backfat thickness measured with a diagnostic ultrasound device and the estimator.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a solution to the comparability problem 2 P ω was recommended. With regard to the within-subject design of the analyses the formula, 2 P ω = df factor * (MS factor − MS error )/SS factor + (N − df factor ) * MS error (5) was used [23], where df factor , MS factor , and SS factor denote the degrees of freedom, the mean squares, and the sum of squares due to the corresponding factor. MS error and SS error denote mean squares and sum of squares of the error, and N denotes the total number of observations.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis Of Cycle Wise Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, consumer depth sensors based on a structured infrared-light(IR) system, such as the Microsoft Kinect (Weber et al, 2015)or the ASUS Xtion Pro, provide 3D data at low cost and have opened new possibilities for acquiring information of livestock conformation. Weber et al have written the software for recording 3D images from TOF camera(SwissRanger SR4000, MesaImaging, Switzerland), taken several cuts along aligned pose of cow through a cow's surface in order to calculate traits that are meaningful to the surface's changes induced by varying body condition during lactation (Weber et al, 2014). But they only observed part body surface of livestock.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As increasing number of studies for shape measurement purposes in livestock farming, many software have been developed in order to acquire 3D surface data of livestock (Kawasue et al, 2013, Weber et al, 2014, Guo et al, 2013, to measure livestock conformation (Weber et al, 2014). However, many of these systems were designed only for scanning part of livestock body and state of art livestock whole body surface scanning systems were hard to deploy under livestock production circumstances.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%