2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of airborne viral emission: Quanta emission rate of SARS-CoV-2 for infection risk assessment

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
886
5
11

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 616 publications
(921 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
19
886
5
11
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar effect has been suggested to occur if a low volume of virions are transmitted between masked individuals when social distancing is being practiced. [68] individuals to be higher than typical [20,21,29] . The inference of high viral loads in prior work stems from an assumption of low volumes of aerosols emitted by index patients (order 1-10 nL/hour) [20,21] .…”
Section: Conclusion and Suggestions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…A similar effect has been suggested to occur if a low volume of virions are transmitted between masked individuals when social distancing is being practiced. [68] individuals to be higher than typical [20,21,29] . The inference of high viral loads in prior work stems from an assumption of low volumes of aerosols emitted by index patients (order 1-10 nL/hour) [20,21] .…”
Section: Conclusion and Suggestions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…37 A forward model was used to estimate a large range of estimated quanta emission rates for SARS-COV-2, depending on activity level and respiratory activity: 10.5-1030 quanta h -1 . 24 To explore the influence of changing the loss rate on the probability of infection, we performed sensitivity simulations in which we varied the loss rate. In these simulations, we used the mean emission rate of E = 970 q h -1 and a constant volumetric breathing rate of Qb = 1.0 m 3 h -1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respiratory infections such as COVID-19 are transmitted through droplets (5 to 10 μm) and aerosols (smaller than 5 μm) exhaled from infected individuals when breathing, speaking, coughing, and sneezing (Prather, Wang, and Schooley 2020). Although there is still plenty of uncertainty about the various ways in which COVID-19 contagion occurs (Leung et al 2020;Han et al 2020), airborne transmission in closed environments has been established by several authors (Morawska and Cao 2020;Shen et al 2020;Prather, Wang, and Schooley 2020;Buonanno, Stabile, and Morawska 2020). Consequently, closed environments are generally riskier than open environments (Nishiura et al 2020;Qian et al 2020).…”
Section: Covid-19 Effects and New Rules For The Use Of Public Transpomentioning
confidence: 99%