1978
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330480218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of age from the pubic symphysis by means of multiple regression analysis

Abstract: This study has been carried out to assess the age from the pubic symphysial surface employing a multiple regression analysis and a quantification theory model I analysis. Using partial regression coefficients and/or normalized scores obtained from the analyses, ages of skeletal remains can be quantitatively estimated with a fairly high reliability. The use of this method is, however, limited to the samples between 18 and 38 years of age, because age changes in the symphysial surface show large variations after… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With Japanese skeletal material, Hanihara (1952) and Hanihara and Suzuki (1978) have studied the pubic symphyseal face in relation to age in males. However, their sample sizes were small (135 and 70 individuals, respectively), and since they used a revised Todd's system as the standard of evaluation, their results cannot be compared with those of other studies based on the original Todd or the Suchey-Brooks systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With Japanese skeletal material, Hanihara (1952) and Hanihara and Suzuki (1978) have studied the pubic symphyseal face in relation to age in males. However, their sample sizes were small (135 and 70 individuals, respectively), and since they used a revised Todd's system as the standard of evaluation, their results cannot be compared with those of other studies based on the original Todd or the Suchey-Brooks systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When methods based on, for example, the pubic symphysis [51][52][53][54][55][56] and auricular surface [57][58][59][60][61] are considered, it is clear that their mean errors are also high. It seems that age estimation in adults still remains challenging, and that the Lamendin and modified Lamendin techniques are probably on par with other methods used in adult age estimation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matsushita (one of the present authors) estimated the age and sex of Yuigahama-minami and Miwanoyama samples on the basis of skeletal morphological traits. For classifica-tion by age, Matsushita observed the progression of cranial sutural closure (Todd and Lyon, 1924, 1925a, 1925b, 1925cPerizonius, 1984) and changes in the pubic symphysial face (Todd, 1920;McKern and Stewart, 1957;Gilbert and McKern, 1973;Hanihara and Suzuki, 1978). In all reports, fully grown skeletons were classified as adolescent (16-20 years old), young adult (21-39 years old), middle-aged (40-59 years old), or senior (60 years and over).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%