Estimation of 3D vegetation structure from waveform and discrete return airborne laser scanning data

Abstract

Access to the published version may require journal subscription. Published with permission from: Elsevier.Standard set statement from the publisher: NOTICE: this is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in Remote Sensing of Environment. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 118, MARCH, (2012) AbstractThis study presents and compares new methods to describe the 3D canopy structure with Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) waveform data as well as ALS point data. The ALS waveform data were analyzed in three different ways; by summing the intensity of the waveforms in height intervals (a); by first normalizing the waveforms with an algorithm based on Beer-Lambert law to compensate for the shielding effect of higher vegetation layers on reflection from lower layers and then summing the intensity (b); and by deriving points from the waveforms (c). As a comparison, conventional, discrete return ALS point data from the laser scanning system were also analyzed (d). The study area was located in hemi-boreal, spruce dominated forest in the southwest of Sweden (Lat. 58° N, Long. 13° E). The vegetation volume profile was defined as the volume of all tree crowns and shrubs in 1 dm height intervals in a field plot and the total vegetation volume as the sum of the vegetation volume profile in the field plot. The total vegetation volume was estimated for 68 field plots with 12 m radius from the proportion between the amount of ALS reflections from the vegetation and the total amount of ALS reflections based on Beer-Lambert law. ALS profiles were derived from the distribution of the ALS data above the ground in 1 dm height intervals. The ALS profiles were rescaled using the estimated total vegetation volume to derive the amount of vegetation at different heights above the ground. The root mean square error (RMSE) for cross validated regression estimates of the total vegetation volume was 31.9% for ALS waveform data (a), 27.6% for normalized waveform data (b), 29.1% for point data derived from the ALS waveforms (c), and 36.5% for ALS point data from the laser scanning system (d). The correspondence between the estimated vegetation volume profiles was also best for the normalized waveform data and the point data derived from the ALS waveforms and worst for ALS point data from the laser scanning system as demonstrated by the Reynolds error index. The results suggest that ALS waveform data describe the volumetric aspects of vertical vegetation structure somewhat more accurately than ALS point data from the laser scanning system and that compensation for the shielding effect of higher vegetation layers is useful. The new methods for estimation of vegetation volume profiles from ALS data could be used i...

Aboveground Biomass Estimation of Individual Trees in a Coastal Planted Forest Using Full-Waveform Airborne Laser Scanning Data

“…For the past decade, most ALS systems produced point cloud (or discrete-return) data [21]. These systems record multiple returns (n ≤ 5) per transmitted pulse with each return representing the 3D position and intensity of the reflected light.…”

“…The FWF systems have advantages with regard to not limiting the number of returns for each laser pulse; providing additional investigation possibilities, e.g., point cloud density can be enhanced by processing the FWF return signal; and additional metrics can be extracted by modeling the received waveforms [30]. The analysis of full-waveform data has improved the urban area classification [31], and the estimations of forest structural variables, e.g., DBH [32], canopy height [33], number of stems [34], stem volume [21] and biomass [35].…”

Forest Canopy LAI and Vertical FAVD Profile Inversion from Airborne Full-Waveform LiDAR Data Based on a Radiative Transfer Model

“…Wagner et al [16] tested LMS-Q560 data and demonstrated that the decomposition was successful for approximately 98% of waveform profiles. These clouds are subsequently used as the discrete data [17], or by building regression models using the calculated waveform metrics with field measurements to estimate forest parameters [18][19][20]. However, neither approach uses all of the information provided in the waveform data.…”

Urban Tree Classification Using Full-Waveform Airborne Laser Scanning

“…in forestry (Hyyppä et al, 2012;Naesset, 2007), plantation (Fieber et al, 2013;Görgens et al, 2015) and urban areas (Höfle et al, 2012;Richter et al, 2013;Yan et al, 2015). The estimation of tree characteristics like the structure and canopy profile (Latifi et al, 2015;Leiterer et al, 2012;Lindberg et al, 2012), the leaf area index (Alonzo et al, 2015;Fieber et al, 2014), the volume and above ground biomass (Allouis et al, 2013;Cao et al, 2014;Pirotti et al, 2014)as well as the classification of tree species (Ghosh et al, 2014;GuangCai et al, 2012;Heinzel and Koch, 2011;Hollaus et al, 2009;Holmgren and Persson, 2004;Hovi et al, 2016) have been applied, especially in forested areas. In contrast to closed forest stands, urban trees are characterized by large species diversity within small areas and a complex (typically anthropogenic) shape.…”