Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.5194/isprsannals-iii-3-185-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban Tree Classification Using Full-Waveform Airborne Laser Scanning

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Vegetation mapping in urban environments plays an important role in biological research and urban management. Airborne laser scanning provides detailed 3D geodata, which allows to classify single trees into different taxa. Until now, research dealing with tree classification focused on forest environments. This study investigates the object-based classification of urban trees at taxonomic family level, using full-waveform airborne laser scanning data captured in the city centre of Vienna (Austria). Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The collinearity analysis in combination with the RFE procedure allowed us to reduce the number of lidar metrics in the classification at each hierarchical level. A similar approach to metric reduction has been used in other lidar‐based vegetation classifications (Millard and Richardson, 2013; Alexander et al, 2016; Koma et al, 2016). In our study, only five lidar metrics related to vegetation structure where needed to separate different land cover types and habitats within this wetland.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collinearity analysis in combination with the RFE procedure allowed us to reduce the number of lidar metrics in the classification at each hierarchical level. A similar approach to metric reduction has been used in other lidar‐based vegetation classifications (Millard and Richardson, 2013; Alexander et al, 2016; Koma et al, 2016). In our study, only five lidar metrics related to vegetation structure where needed to separate different land cover types and habitats within this wetland.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the authors warn that the algorithms are over-adapted for the specific forest type. Studies using data derived from LiDAR or Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) cite slightly higher accuracies ranging from 80% to 90% [9,18,[66][67][68][69], while recent deep learning developments reached accuracies of >90% [4,70,71].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The points in the first zone were manually classified when classifying landscape vegetation. The automated process was set to exclude the lowest zone because of interference of urban reflecting objects (47,48). Buildings: Buildings and houses enter the streetscape peripherally.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%