2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-010-9290-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation method for railway passengers’ train choice behavior with smart card transaction data

Abstract: Smart card data, Travel behavior, Railway passenger, Train timetable,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(12 reference statements)
2
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies use discrete choice analysis extensively to predict passenger choice . As demonstrated in the case study, we figure out the key issue of estimating passenger boarding plans, based on which all the route choice, section flow, load factor, and so forth can be deduced, furthermore, and no longer depend on the assumption that smart card data that could not be identified to the possible train choices would be assigned with equal probability (Kusakabe et al, 2010). Furthermore, the proposed approach improves the methodologies of Sun and Schonfeld [19] and Zhou and Xu [20] on calculating passenger boarding plans.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies use discrete choice analysis extensively to predict passenger choice . As demonstrated in the case study, we figure out the key issue of estimating passenger boarding plans, based on which all the route choice, section flow, load factor, and so forth can be deduced, furthermore, and no longer depend on the assumption that smart card data that could not be identified to the possible train choices would be assigned with equal probability (Kusakabe et al, 2010). Furthermore, the proposed approach improves the methodologies of Sun and Schonfeld [19] and Zhou and Xu [20] on calculating passenger boarding plans.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in spite of the widespread attention on the use of AFC data, there are fewer studies dealing with the passenger train choice behavior in a URT system. Kusakabe et al [17] developed a methodology for estimating which train would be boarded by each smart card holder using long-term transaction data. Their approach was based on the assumption that smart card data that could not be identified to the possible train choices would be assigned with equal probability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As access to public or shared transport systems becomes increasingly digitised, new datasets have emerged offering opportunities to research travel behaviour in a continuous, large-scale and non-invasive way (Blythe and Bryan 2007;Froehlich, Neumann, and Oliver 2008;Kusakabe, Iryo, and Asakura 2010;P ‡ez, TrŽpanier, and Morency 2011;Lathia, Ahmed, and Capra 2012). The data produced by urban bike share schemes can be regarded as a particular instance of these new datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of tours threshold ranges as [1,2,5,10,15,20,30,40,50,60,70,80,90,100,120,150,180]. For example, a value of 5 indicates that any travelers with less than five tours are disqualified and discarded, while the travelers with 5 or more are qualified and collected.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one offers traffic information to impact travelers' decisions, which does not force behavior change [18]. Implementation cases include a comparison study of passengers' travel choice behavior by altering the train timetable, proposed by Kusakabe in Japan [19,20]; a dynamic ridesharing service, Virtual Bus in Italy [21]; a Predict-aTrip traffic information forecast program in San Francisco [22]; and so on. The second category of "soft" measures uses incentives to influence traveler behavior and has recently attracted attention worldwide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%