2000
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2000.10474283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation for Polynomial Structural Equation Models

Abstract: Structural equation analysis is one of the most widely used statistical methods in social and behavioral science research and has become a popular tool in marketing. Subject matter needs for considering nonlinear structural models have been well documented. But current fitting procedures are available only for a limited class of models. In this article a systematic statistical approach is developed for the general polynomial structural equation model. The new procedure applies a method of moments procedure sim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limited information approach is adopted here. The general framework of structural equation modelling includes models for continuous variables, categorical variables, and mixtures of variables (Arminger & Küsters, 1988;Muthén, 1984), confirmatory factor analysis (Jöreskog, 1969), mixed effects analysis (Fan & Hancock, 2012), multi-group analysis (Jöreskog, 1971;Muthén, 1989), latent growth curve analysis (Bollen & Curran, 2006), and non-linear models (Jöreskog & Yang, 1996;Wall & Amemiya, 2000) as special cases. Estimation and testing remain important research topics when models involve non-normally distributed observed variables such as ordinal variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limited information approach is adopted here. The general framework of structural equation modelling includes models for continuous variables, categorical variables, and mixtures of variables (Arminger & Küsters, 1988;Muthén, 1984), confirmatory factor analysis (Jöreskog, 1969), mixed effects analysis (Fan & Hancock, 2012), multi-group analysis (Jöreskog, 1971;Muthén, 1989), latent growth curve analysis (Bollen & Curran, 2006), and non-linear models (Jöreskog & Yang, 1996;Wall & Amemiya, 2000) as special cases. Estimation and testing remain important research topics when models involve non-normally distributed observed variables such as ordinal variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include but are not limited to: (i) CSEM analysis with categorical data [29][30][31]; (ii) linear or nonlinear CSEM with covariates [32,33]; (iii) CSEM with nonlinear correlation [34,35], (iv) CSEM with multilevel dimensions [36][37][38]; (v) mixtures of CSEM [39,40]; (vi) CSEM with exponential indicators [41], (vii) CSEM with multi-sample [42,43], and (viii) CSEM with missing data [44,45].…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. Some recent alternative approaches include the Bayesian approach of Arminger and Muthén (1998) the two-step method of moments approach of Wall and Amemiya (2000), and the quasi maximum likelihood estimation method (Klein and Muthén, Quasi maximum likelihood estimation of structural equation models with multiple interaction and quadratic effects. Submitted to Multivariate Behavioral Research).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%