2001
DOI: 10.2307/3802907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the Total Number of Birds Using a Staging Site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model estimates densities averaged for the date of the single survey, and future work should model stopover time and estimate total numbers of birds using each site during the entire season (Frederiksen et al 2001;Cohen et al 2009). However, these density values are the first data ever presented that allow detailed comparisons among river deltas within the study area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model estimates densities averaged for the date of the single survey, and future work should model stopover time and estimate total numbers of birds using each site during the entire season (Frederiksen et al 2001;Cohen et al 2009). However, these density values are the first data ever presented that allow detailed comparisons among river deltas within the study area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less well recognized is that changes in the LOS alter the number of birds censused, even if the total population does not change. To estimate the true number of birds (N T ) stopping over at Sidney Island, we incorporated our LOS estimates with the N C values in an arrival-stopover-departure model (Frederiksen et al 2001). The outcome (figure 4) provides no evidence for a drop in N T .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the assessment of the importance of stopover sites for waterbirds has typically been based on peak counts of any species, which underestimate the total number of birds using the site over a season because of the turnover of individuals (Frederiksen et al 2001). This method highlighted the importance of conserving large wetlands that commonly support big flocks of a species during migration, whereas it underestimated the importance of small wetland areas that do not support large numbers of migratory birds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%