Estimating the Relative Uncertainties Sourced from GCMs and Hydrological Models in Modeling Climate Change Impact on Runoff

Abstract

This paper assesses the relative uncertainties from GCMs and from hydrological models in modeling climate change impact on runoff across southeast Australia. Five lumped conceptual daily rainfall–runoff models are used to model runoff using historical daily climate series and using future climate series obtained by empirically scaling the historical climate series informed by simulations from 15 GCMs. The majority of the GCMs project a drier future for this region, particularly in the southern parts, and this is amplified as a bigger reduction in the runoff. The results indicate that the uncertainty sourced from the GCMs is much larger than the uncertainty in the rainfall–runoff models. The variability in the climate change impact on runoff results for one rainfall–runoff model informed by 15 GCMs (an about 28%–35% difference between the minimum and maximum results for mean annual, mean seasonal, and high runoff) is considerably larger than the variability in the results between the five rainfall–runoff models informed by 1 GCM (a less than 7% difference between the minimum and maximum results). The difference between the rainfall–runoff modeling results is larger in the drier regions for scenarios of big declines in future rainfall and in the low-flow characteristics. The rainfall–runoff modeling here considers only the runoff sensitivity to changes in the input climate data (primarily daily rainfall), and the difference between the hydrological modeling results is likely to be greater if potential changes in the climate–runoff relationship in a warmer and higher CO2 environment are modeled.

Streamflow Modelling: A Primer on Applications, Approaches and Challenges

“…The choices made in estimating these model parameters as well as the choice of global climate model result in a broad range of possible future scenarios (Christensen et al, 2004). Wilby et al (2006) and Teng et al (2012) have illustrated that uncertainty in future climate change scenarios far outweighs uncertainties associated with hydrological models. Others have found that GCM uncertainty dominates the early part of the forecast horizon, but then other sources of uncertainty become more important (Jost and Weber, 2012).…”

Intercomparison of different uncertainty sources in hydrological climate change projections for an alpine catchment (upper Clutha River, New Zealand)

“…A common finding is that hydrological model uncertainty is less important than other uncertainty sources (i.e. GCM), but cannot be ignored (Prudhomme and Davies, 2009;Teng et al, 2012;Thompson et al, 2013;Velázquez et al, 2013). However, for certain hydrological indicators (e.g.…”

Long-term Uncertainty of Hydropower Revenue Due to Climate Change and Electricity Prices

“…Gabbi et al (2014) test five different glacier melt models and show that the choice of the melt approach is crucial. Finally, Teng et al (2012) analyse a case study where uncertainty is mostly led by GCM rather than the rainfall model. These studies, together with our results, show that uncertainty, like forecasting, is case study and model related.…”