2018
DOI: 10.5194/hess-22-3125-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intercomparison of different uncertainty sources in hydrological climate change projections for an alpine catchment (upper Clutha River, New Zealand)

Abstract: Abstract. As climate change is projected to alter both temperature and precipitation, snow-controlled mid-latitude catchments are expected to experience substantial shifts in their seasonal regime, which will have direct implications for water management. In order to provide authoritative projections of climate change impacts, the uncertainty inherent to all components of the modelling chain needs to be accounted for. This study assesses the uncertainty in potential impacts of climate change on the hydro-clima… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some of them, the GCM structure is identified as the dominant source of uncertainty, e.g., [42][43][44]. A common finding for other studies is that in the hydrological model, uncertainty is less important than other sources but cannot be ignored [45][46][47]. Ideally, the analysis of hydrologic change in future studies should comprehend the full suite of uncertainties associated with global climate modeling, climate downscaling, hydrologic modeling, and natural climate variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some of them, the GCM structure is identified as the dominant source of uncertainty, e.g., [42][43][44]. A common finding for other studies is that in the hydrological model, uncertainty is less important than other sources but cannot be ignored [45][46][47]. Ideally, the analysis of hydrologic change in future studies should comprehend the full suite of uncertainties associated with global climate modeling, climate downscaling, hydrologic modeling, and natural climate variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precipitation was also interpolated using a trivariate spline, with a 30-year normal surface included as a covariate (Jobst, 2017 3. Global gridded (2.5 • ) NCEP/NCAR meteorological reanalysis data (Kalnay et al, 1996), used as input fields for the HYSPLIT (version 4) model. Data were acquired from the Climate Data Center (CDC) via the FTP module within the HYSPLIT software.…”
Section: Climatic Influences On Snow Cover Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, areas of mountain ranges above this elevation were manually digitised using a DEM (Columbus et al, 2011) and stream centreline vector data (Snelder et al, 2010) as guidance ( Figure 3). Since the Main Divide of the Southern Alps is considered to provide a baseline for climatic gradients in the east of the South Island, owing to predominant westerly air flow and the substantial orographic effects of the Southern Alps (Sinclair et al, 1997;Jobst et al, 2018), the distance from each range to the main divide of the Southern Alps was calculated using the Near tool in ArcGIS v10.3. Mean annual SCD anomalies for each range were then extracted from the maps calculated in Section 3.3.2.…”
Section: Mountain Range Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While water management is not a new concept in these areas, the role of snow in the hydrological cycle, and the impact of variability in the extent and duration of winter snow cover in the Central Otago mountain ranges, has received little attention. While modelling studies indicate that significant future changes in the snow hydrology of the Clutha Catchment are likely (e.g., Poyck et al, 2011;Jobst, 2017;Jobst et al, 2018), observational studies of snow hydrology have been discontinuous and mostly limited to small sub-catchments (e.g., Fitzharris et al, 1980;Fitzharris and Grimmond, 1982;Sims and Orwin, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%