1991
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the Relation between Dietary Intake Obtained from a Food Frequency Questionnaire and True Average Intake

Abstract: Knowledge of the regression relation between dietary intake reported on a food frequency questionnaire and true average intake is useful in interpreting results from nutritional epidemiologic studies and in planning such studies. Studies which validate a questionnaire against a food record may be used to estimate this regression relation provided the food record is completed by each subject on at least two occasions. Using data collected from women aged 45-69 years during 1985-1986 in the pilot study of the Wo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
57
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Freedman et al 41 , the low-magnitude of correlation may be a result of several factors, including: biased reporting, where people with high food intake tend to underestimate consumption; reference method bias; variations in food intake during the study period; and difficulties in recalling food intake and correctly estimating food portions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Freedman et al 41 , the low-magnitude of correlation may be a result of several factors, including: biased reporting, where people with high food intake tend to underestimate consumption; reference method bias; variations in food intake during the study period; and difficulties in recalling food intake and correctly estimating food portions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison to results of similar studies affords insights to the reliability and utility of the NHEXAS-MD dietary exposure data. The principal limitations of various dietary assessment approaches include the reproducibility of consumption measurements (Willett et al, 1985;Feskanich et al, 1993;Xing et al, 1995), the inability of the food record or diary to estimate long-term average intake (Freedman et al, 1991), and the validity of results based on recall methods (Willett et al, 1985;Block and Hartman, 1989;Feskanich et al, 1993;Liu, 1994). The food checklist method used here is a combination of a dietary record and FFQ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our reference instrument is multiple non-consecutive 24-hour recalls. We applied a measurement error model described by Freedman et al 13 to estimate relationships between true intake and the test instruments, assuming that the reference instrument (24-hour recalls) is unbiased at the individual level and contains only within-person error.…”
Section: Measurement Error Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%