Estimating the Natural Rate of Interest in an Open Economy

Abstract

The concept of the natural or equilibrium rate of interest has attracted a lot of attention from monetary policymakers in recent years. Most attempts to estimate the natural rate use a closed economy framework. We argue that in the face of greater integration of global product and capital markets, an open economy framework is more appropriate. We provide some initial estimates of the natural rate for the United States and Japan in a two-country framework. Our identifying assumptions include a close relationship between the time-varying natural rate of interest and the low-frequency fluctuations of potential output growth in both the home country and the foreign country. Our results suggest that the natural rates in both countries are mainly determined by their own trend growth rates of potential output. Nevertheless, the other country's trend growth plays an important role in several specific periods. The gap between the actual real interest rate and our estimated natural rate offers valuable insights into the recent stance of monetary policy in both of these two countries.

Estimates of the Natural Rate of Interest for Russia: Is Navigating by the Stars Useful?

“…-an open or a closed economy (Hledik and Vlcek, 2018;Wynne and Zhang, 2018); -an economy with financial rigidities or an economy without rigidities (Eggertsson and Krugman, 2012;Caballero and Krishnamurthy, 2002). Even such a factor as the trust of economic agents in the central bank can turn out to be crucial to the level of the equilibrium rate, as shown by Tristani (2009).…”

Shock-Dependent Exchange Rate Pass-Through: Evidence Based on a Narrative Sign Approach

“…More detailed surveys of the monetary history in Japan can be found inDell'Ariccia et al (2018) andWynne and Zhang (2018a) among others.13 Standard unit root tests indicate that the level of the policy rate is not stationary, but the detrended level is stationary.14 We select twenty-five important trade partners of Japan from 187 countries based on import goods value data from the International Monetary Funds Directions of Trade Statistics. The countries (regions) that we include are: Australia, Canada, China, Denmark, Finland, France Germany, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, Philippines, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan (Province of China), Thailand, the U.K. and the U.S.…”