2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-19419-6_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the Intensity of Long-Range Dependence in Real and Synthetic Traffic Traces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figs. 2 (a-d) show the traffic generated after the simulation using different Pareto parameters, for example, (10, 0.8), (10, 1.2), (10,16) and (10, 1.8). Fig.…”
Section: Hurst Index and Fractal Dimension Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figs. 2 (a-d) show the traffic generated after the simulation using different Pareto parameters, for example, (10, 0.8), (10, 1.2), (10,16) and (10, 1.8). Fig.…”
Section: Hurst Index and Fractal Dimension Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 (a -d) show how Hurst index is estimated using Eq. (13,15,16). The Average of the several methods are considered because each method has its accuracy and error.…”
Section: Hurst Index and Fractal Dimension Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The studies have proven that ignoring these phenomena has a negative effect on the estimation of performance measurements. This can result in mean queue length enlargement at buffers and packet loss probability increase [ 10 ]. Because of this negative impact on the network performance [ 4 ], these phenomena should be taken into consideration in the network management process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fractional Gaussian Noise (FGN) is a stationary Gaussian process that is exactly self-similar. For that reason, it has become common to use FGN in the network traffic modeling [ 10 ]. An alternative is to use the Fractional Auto-regressive Integrated Moving Average (FARIMA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%