Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) Held Jointly With 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference 2009
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2009.5400030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the fates of the control packets for Networked Control Systems with loss of control and measurement packets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, it cannot be used in practice. To address the computational complexity, various linear [2,15,17,18] and nonlinear [19,20] sub-optimal estimators have been proposed to approximate the optimal estimator, but they are not good approximations in terms of the estimation criterion, since the criterion for these linear estimators (see Definition 5) differs from the criterion for the optimal estimator (see Definition 1). From [19,20], it is clear that the nonlinear estimators are not obtained according to either one of these two criteria above.…”
Section: A Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, it cannot be used in practice. To address the computational complexity, various linear [2,15,17,18] and nonlinear [19,20] sub-optimal estimators have been proposed to approximate the optimal estimator, but they are not good approximations in terms of the estimation criterion, since the criterion for these linear estimators (see Definition 5) differs from the criterion for the optimal estimator (see Definition 1). From [19,20], it is clear that the nonlinear estimators are not obtained according to either one of these two criteria above.…”
Section: A Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the computational complexity, various linear [2,15,17,18] and nonlinear [19,20] sub-optimal estimators have been proposed to approximate the optimal estimator, but they are not good approximations in terms of the estimation criterion, since the criterion for these linear estimators (see Definition 5) differs from the criterion for the optimal estimator (see Definition 1). From [19,20], it is clear that the nonlinear estimators are not obtained according to either one of these two criteria above. As one of the most costefficient estimation schemes, the interacting multiple model (IMM) estimator is proven to be a good approximation for the optimal estimator, since it is able to obtain the estimate fairly close to the optimal one [21][22][23], which motivates us to apply the IMM estimator to UDP-like systems, and then explore its properties, especially the three aforementioned key aspects: stability, convergence, and performance.…”
Section: A Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the systems with random losses of ACK signals, we show that the optimal estimation is quite different from the TVKF for the systems with ACK in [11], and from those for the systems without ACK in [17,18]. In the optimal estimation, the number of terms increases exponentially as the ACK signals drop, which makes its computation timeconsuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The stability of the OE only depends on the observation packet loss rate; however, the OE consists of an exponentially growing number of components, making its computation time-consuming [13]. To address the computational problem, two approximate optimal estimators (AOEs) [3,12] were developed to compute the optimal estimates for S i.i.d…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%