2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating soil freezing characteristic curve based on pore-size distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before regression, a cumulative NMR-detected PSD was obtained via the mathematical method (Figure 8). The cumulative distribution was similar to a water retention curve, which was typically characterized via the VG model (van Genuchten, 1980;Wang et al, 2017). In this study, a variant VG model was proposed to achieve a better representation of the cumulative NMR-detected PSD:…”
Section: Modeling Nmr-detected Psdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Before regression, a cumulative NMR-detected PSD was obtained via the mathematical method (Figure 8). The cumulative distribution was similar to a water retention curve, which was typically characterized via the VG model (van Genuchten, 1980;Wang et al, 2017). In this study, a variant VG model was proposed to achieve a better representation of the cumulative NMR-detected PSD:…”
Section: Modeling Nmr-detected Psdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu and Yu (2013) suggested a bundle of cylindrical capillary (BCC) model extending from the nonfrozen saturated soils to characterize pores of frozen soils. Wang et al (2017) assumed several forms of PSD function, such as constant pore size, pore size varying inversely with r 2 (where r is the pore radius), etc. Bai, Lai, Zhang, and Yu (2018) obtained the PSD according to the proposed relationship between pore radius and freezing point.…”
Section: Core Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A significant amount of data is published in the literature following these methods. The second approach focuses on the estimation of SFCC from soil physical properties, or using the similarity between SFCC and SWCC and/or physical and theoretical mechanisms (Anderson and Tice, 1972; Liu and Yu, 2013; Wang et al, 2017; Amiri et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between liquid water content and temperature, commonly referred to as the soil freezing characteristic curve (SFCC), has been described with empirical functions of various forms including power law (Anderson and Tice, 1972), exponential (Michalowski and Zhu, 2006), piecewise linear (McKenzie et al, 2007), and nonlinear piecewise functions (Kozlowski, 2007). The SFCCs vary depending on the soil type, with differences often related to the soil's specific surface area (Dillon and Andersland, 1966; Anderson and Tice, 1972; Kozlowski, 2007) or the pore size distribution (Liu and Yu, 2013; Wang et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%