SAE Technical Paper Series 2001
DOI: 10.4271/2001-01-2818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Safety Benefits for the IVI Generation 0 Field Operational Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other uses of this type of model have been the assessment of the safety impact of in-vehicle information systems, with S being the first glance back toward the road after a lead vehicle has begun deceleration (Smith, Chang, Cohen, Foley, & Glassco, 2005), development of road geometry design guidelines, with S being the sudden appearance of an unexpected obstacle (Fambro, Fitzpatrick, & Koppa, 2000), and a study of accident causation mechanisms, with S representing the establishment of an initial collision course (Davis, 2007; Davis & Swenson, 2006). McMillan, Christiaen, and Stark (2001) also relied on this general account of collision avoidance behavior for estimating the collision probability inherent in a given empirically observed rear-end situation, but instead of defining S explicitly they varied brake initiation timing and deceleration magnitude around the empirically observed values.…”
Section: Models Of Driver Behavior In Collision Situationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other uses of this type of model have been the assessment of the safety impact of in-vehicle information systems, with S being the first glance back toward the road after a lead vehicle has begun deceleration (Smith, Chang, Cohen, Foley, & Glassco, 2005), development of road geometry design guidelines, with S being the sudden appearance of an unexpected obstacle (Fambro, Fitzpatrick, & Koppa, 2000), and a study of accident causation mechanisms, with S representing the establishment of an initial collision course (Davis, 2007; Davis & Swenson, 2006). McMillan, Christiaen, and Stark (2001) also relied on this general account of collision avoidance behavior for estimating the collision probability inherent in a given empirically observed rear-end situation, but instead of defining S explicitly they varied brake initiation timing and deceleration magnitude around the empirically observed values.…”
Section: Models Of Driver Behavior In Collision Situationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What if this traffic situation would have looked slightly different? (Davis & Swenson, 2006; McMillan et al, 2001).…”
Section: Models Of Driver Behavior In Collision Situationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A benefit equation is introduced that is used to estimate the reduction in the number of crashes attributable to the intervention of an active safety technology. Variants of this equation have been used in other studies to estimate safety benefits from deployment of intelligent vehicle safety systems, for example (8,9). The following procedure is a method to calculate B, the benefit derived from an active safety technology such as ESC, RSC, or a combination.…”
Section: Benefit Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%