2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2017.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating prognosis at the time of repeat whole brain radiation therapy for multiple brain metastases: The reirradiation score

Abstract: PurposeWhole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) remains the standard of care for patients with multiple brain metastases, but more than half of treated patients will develop intracranial progression. Because there is no clear consensus on the optimal therapeutic approach, a prognostic index would be helpful to guide treatment options at progression. We explored whether the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) score prior to repeat WBRT is predictive of survival.Methods and materialsThis multi-institutional pooled… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
22
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also assessed the utility of the previously published ReRT score, which incorporates KPS <80, interval to ReRT < 9 months, uncontrolled primary, small cell histology, and presence of extracranial metastases, with 1 point given for each variable present. 8 ReRT score of 1 to 2 was associated with improved overall survival compared with a score of 3 to 4 with a median survival of 4.60 months (95% CI, 3.73-5.47 months) versus 2.86 months (95% CI, 0.86-4.86, P Z .01), thus validating the original study (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We also assessed the utility of the previously published ReRT score, which incorporates KPS <80, interval to ReRT < 9 months, uncontrolled primary, small cell histology, and presence of extracranial metastases, with 1 point given for each variable present. 8 ReRT score of 1 to 2 was associated with improved overall survival compared with a score of 3 to 4 with a median survival of 4.60 months (95% CI, 3.73-5.47 months) versus 2.86 months (95% CI, 0.86-4.86, P Z .01), thus validating the original study (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In terms of patient selection, validating the value of the ReRT score in this cohort suggests the validity of this tool in prognostication in this population. 8 Certainly, the characteristics of this cohort are quite different from the ReRT cohort, as the ReRT score was built from 5 significant findings on univariate analysis of KPS <80, interval <9 months, uncontrolled primary, small cell histology, and presence of extracranial metastases. We found that only KPS was associated with worse survival in our cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that there was no statistically significant difference in survival since re-WBRT between KPS > 70 and KPS < 70 at either initial presentation or at re-WBRT. We only found a single study evaluating the relation of RPA with post re-WBRT survival(22). They reported that median survival was better in patients with post re-WBRT RPA class I and this was in concordance with findings of our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, patients who have regional failure after WBRT can undergo effective salvage SRS with low morbidity and may have similar outcomes to those who experience first brain metastases with similar performance status. 6,[10][11][12][13][14][15] Local treatment should be evaluated for patients with multiple brain metastases and good performance status for whom salvages SRS is technically feasible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%