2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-020-2886-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating pressure fields from planar velocity data around immersed bodies; a finite element approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first computes the pressure field from the Poisson equation, i.e. as shown below for an inviscid flow ( Fujisawa et al, 2005 ; de Kat and and van Oudheusden, 2012 ; Shams et al, 2015 ; Neeteson and Rival, 2015 ; Pirnia et al, 2020 ): where p is the pressure, u is the velocity vector, ρ is the fluid density and D u /D t is the material derivative. However, Charonko et al (2010) and Pan et al (2016) have shown that the Poisson-based solvers are sensitive to the grid resolution, flow type, velocity measurement errors, the shape of the immersed body and the type of boundary conditions that are applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first computes the pressure field from the Poisson equation, i.e. as shown below for an inviscid flow ( Fujisawa et al, 2005 ; de Kat and and van Oudheusden, 2012 ; Shams et al, 2015 ; Neeteson and Rival, 2015 ; Pirnia et al, 2020 ): where p is the pressure, u is the velocity vector, ρ is the fluid density and D u /D t is the material derivative. However, Charonko et al (2010) and Pan et al (2016) have shown that the Poisson-based solvers are sensitive to the grid resolution, flow type, velocity measurement errors, the shape of the immersed body and the type of boundary conditions that are applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To then obtain the surface pressure, one would typically have to extrapolate from the nearest neighbor node in the surrounding pressure field. Pirnia et al (2020) demonstrated that such an approach can provide a very accurate prediction of the surface pressure around stationary objects. However, the error increases greatly when the object is free to deform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, there have been two main categories of this approach. The first computes the pressure field from the Poisson equation, i.e., as shown below for an inviscid flow (Fujisawa et al, 2005; de Kat et al, 2012; Shams et al, 2015; Neeteson et al, 2015; Pirnia et al, 2020). where p is the pressure, u is the velocity vector, ρ is the fluid density, and D / Dt is the material derivative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one could include turbulence modelling via Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) formulations to compute averaged pressure fields (e.g., Gurka et al (1999); van Oudheusden et al (2007)) or leverage Taylor's frozen turbulence hypothesis to compute instantaneous pressures (de Kat and Oudheusden, 2011;der Kindere et al, 2019;Laskari et al, 2016). Within the class of Eulerian methods, more sophisticated methods include solvers based on pressurevelocity algorithms from CFD (Felis-Carrasco et al, 2021;Gunaydinoglu and Kurtulus, 2019) or immersed boundary techniques (Pirnia et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%