1997
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(1997)123:6(459)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Magnitude and Duration of Incident Delays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
82
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
82
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of these previous studies (see also [10,11]), it can be concluded that each method seems to have its own strengths and weaknesses, thus no single method is expected to be the best method under all circumstances. If the full incident duration prediction horizon is to be covered, a combination of methods seems to be the best option.…”
Section: Previous Studies On Incident Duration Predictionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…On the basis of these previous studies (see also [10,11]), it can be concluded that each method seems to have its own strengths and weaknesses, thus no single method is expected to be the best method under all circumstances. If the full incident duration prediction horizon is to be covered, a combination of methods seems to be the best option.…”
Section: Previous Studies On Incident Duration Predictionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Traffic incident duration is defined as the elapsed time from the moment an incident is detected until its cause is removed from the scene (Garib et al, 1997;Nam and Mannering, 2000;Smith and Smith, 2001). Charles (2007) defined traffic incident duration in broader terms as the length of time between incident occurrence and return to normal traffic flow as shown in Figure 3.3.…”
Section: Traffic Incident Duration Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most well-known linear regression models for incident duration was developed by Garib et al (1997) The indication of goodness of fit (R 2 ) of this model was reported as 0.81 indicating promising results. However, the applicability of this model was limited because of the relatively smaller sample size used.…”
Section: Linear Regression Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations