2012
DOI: 10.1002/atr.1189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examination of factors affecting freeway incident clearance times: a comparison of the generalized F model and several alternative nested models

Abstract: Traffic incidents are a principal cause of congestion on urban freeways, reducing capacity and creating risks for both involved motorists and incident response personnel. As incident durations increase, the risk of secondary incidents or crashes also becomes problematic. In response to these issues, many road agencies in metropolitan areas have initiated incident management programs aimed at detecting, responding to, and clearing incidents to restore freeways to full capacity as quickly and safely as possible.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the travel time, the hazard function is a monotonically increasing function, which suggests that the likelihood that the stage will end increases only with the length of time that has already occurred; similar results have been obtained with regard to the hazard function of crash durations or traffic hazard-related accidents [23]. With regard to clearance time, the estimated hazard function is initially shown to decrease up to the minimum at an inflection point, is reached, then increases over time, which indicates that the probability of an accident being cleared quickly is highest during the period after the police first arrives on the scene, which coincides with the findings of other studies [22]. Table 2 lists the results of the coefficient estimation analysis for various accident duration stages.…”
Section: Study Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the travel time, the hazard function is a monotonically increasing function, which suggests that the likelihood that the stage will end increases only with the length of time that has already occurred; similar results have been obtained with regard to the hazard function of crash durations or traffic hazard-related accidents [23]. With regard to clearance time, the estimated hazard function is initially shown to decrease up to the minimum at an inflection point, is reached, then increases over time, which indicates that the probability of an accident being cleared quickly is highest during the period after the police first arrives on the scene, which coincides with the findings of other studies [22]. Table 2 lists the results of the coefficient estimation analysis for various accident duration stages.…”
Section: Study Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…With regard to distribution, Ghosh et al [22] found that the generalized F distribution is the best fit for the incident clearance time data from the southeastern Michigan freeway network. In this study, longer clearance times were observed during the winter months on road segments with horizontal curves when accidents required the closure of travel lanes, affected adjacent traffic, or exit ramps were unavailable for motorists or FCP responders.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Their analysis suggested the random parameter Weibull structure to be suitable for incident duration resulting from crashes and hazards, and the fixed parameter Weibull structure with Gamma heterogeneity to be suitable for modelling incident duration resulting from stationary vehicles. As a further instance, Ghosh et al introduced the application of generalized F distribution for freeway incident clearance time AFT modelling and found this structure to outperform five other nested parametric structures.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ghosh et al found that the generalized F distribution was the best‐fit distribution compared with other distributions. They based their study on the incident clearance data from southeastern Michigan freeway network.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%