2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating forest carbon fluxes using four different data-driven techniques based on long-term eddy covariance measurements: Model comparison and evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NN have been used to identify and model factors influencing NEE and to 385 partition NEE into ER and GPP (Moffat et al, 2010). NNs have even been used to upscale fluxes from the ecosystem level to the continental scale (Dou and Yang, 2018;Papale et al, 2003).…”
Section: Appendix A: Neural Network Analysis and Uncertainty Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NN have been used to identify and model factors influencing NEE and to 385 partition NEE into ER and GPP (Moffat et al, 2010). NNs have even been used to upscale fluxes from the ecosystem level to the continental scale (Dou and Yang, 2018;Papale et al, 2003).…”
Section: Appendix A: Neural Network Analysis and Uncertainty Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these ML models have been successful in estimating RE at different temporal and spatial scales, some uncertainties still exist. For instance, these ML models are usually constructed based on different learning principles; however, few attempts have been made to compare the predictive performance of these models in estimating RE [12]. Some advanced ML models, such as deep learning (DL) models, have not yet been tested for estimating RE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the above-mentioned drawbacks of estimating LAI from space-borne data and crop growth models, this study obtains LAI in forests from meteorological data via employing the GEP technique. In the recent years, GEP has been applied to many hydrological problems such as estimation of solar radiation (Landeras et al, 2012), air temperature (Kisi et al, 2013a;Kisi and Shiri, 2014;Shiri et al, 2014a), pan evaporation (Kisi et al, 2012;Pour Alibaba et al, 2013;Kisi, 2015;Kim et al, 2015), forest carbon fluxes (Dou and Yang, 2018), crop evapotranspiration (Torres et al, 2011;Shiri et al, 2014b, c;Shrestha and Shukla, 2015;Karimi et al, 2016), soil parameters (Shiri et al, 2017a, b), river flows (Liu et al, 2014;Karimi et al, 2017) and river qualitative parameters (Kisi et al, 2013b). Recently, Karimi et al (2018) utilized GEP and random forest to estimate LAI in croplands and grasslands from in-situ meteorological data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%