2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating diffusion coefficients of shale oil, gas, and condensate with nano-confinement effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different values of tortuosity, ranging between 1.74 and 2.69, were obtained, which are reasonable values for shale tortuosity given past results in the literature. 49…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different values of tortuosity, ranging between 1.74 and 2.69, were obtained, which are reasonable values for shale tortuosity given past results in the literature. 49…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is significant to construct a microscopic visible model to reflect the actual porous media. [91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99] Figure 13 shows the CO 2 flooding process based on a visible porous medium model. Brine (colorless) sealed by oil (dark) can be observed at the end of channels after oil injection (Figure 13a).…”
Section: Pore-scale Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CO 2 huff-n-puff showed a better performance than gas flooding, and more than 50% of the injected CO 2 was successfully sequestrated in the reservoir. Du and Nojabaei (2020; included the nano-confinement effect to calculate the diffusion coefficient of CO 2 in a shale gas reservoir and optimized the huff-n-puff gas injection parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%