2014
DOI: 10.1109/jmems.2013.2286199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Damping in Microresonators by Measuring Thermomechanical Noise Using Laser Doppler Vibrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the three major classes of linear damping (viscous, viscoelastic, and anelastic), the first peak (corresponding to the fundamental natural frequency) is symmetric and well-approximated by a simple Lorentzian function given by [18], [33] ( ) ( ) ( )…”
Section: Estimating Q From Thermomechanical Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the three major classes of linear damping (viscous, viscoelastic, and anelastic), the first peak (corresponding to the fundamental natural frequency) is symmetric and well-approximated by a simple Lorentzian function given by [18], [33] ( ) ( ) ( )…”
Section: Estimating Q From Thermomechanical Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harmonic excitation is associated with two dimensionless measures of damping: the loss angle, ϕ, by which the stress (σ) leads the strain (ɛ); and the quality factor, Q ≡ (ω n /Δω), where Δω is the half-power bandwidth of the resonance peak and ω n is the angular natural frequency. Alternately, the quality factor can be estimated by fitting the resonance peak in the thermomechanical noise spectrum [10][11][12]. The free decay technique quantifies damping in terms of the logarithmic decrement, δ, and wave propagation techniques measure the attenuation,α, of the amplitude of elastic waves with wavelength λ [9].…”
Section: Foundations Of Dampingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, deterministic noise peaks can be clearly identified and removed before fitting an SHO model to the PSD, thereby allowing robust and accurate calibration of the cantilever stiffness and damping. The removal of electronic noise peaks is especially useful for very high Q cantilevers, 51,52 such as in vacuum experiments, where the cantilever thermal noise can easily be mistaken for electronic noise and vice versa. Reducing the burden in distinguishing between stochastic and deterministic noise sources paves the way for accurate and robust automated PSD fitting software and AFM automation algorithms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%