2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4943292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daniell method for power spectral density estimation in atomic force microscopy

Abstract: An alternative method for power spectral density (PSD) estimation--the Daniell method--is revisited and compared to the most prevalent method used in the field of atomic force microscopy for quantifying cantilever thermal motion--the Bartlett method. Both methods are shown to underestimate the Q factor of a simple harmonic oscillator (SHO) by a predictable, and therefore correctable, amount in the absence of spurious deterministic noise sources. However, the Bartlett method is much more prone to spectral leaka… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An automated calibration method [ 61 ] was used to obtain the stiffness of the first eigenmode ( k c1 = 43.2 N/m), which was then used as a basis of calibration for the second eigenmode stiffness k c2 = 818 N/m by a recently established calibration protocol [ 62 ]. Next, a thermal power spectral density [ 63 ] of the cantilever was acquired close to the surface (within a few hundred nanometers) to determine the remaining cantilever properties ( f c1 , f c2 , Q c1 , Q c2 ). For this calibration step, the proximity to the surface is important.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An automated calibration method [ 61 ] was used to obtain the stiffness of the first eigenmode ( k c1 = 43.2 N/m), which was then used as a basis of calibration for the second eigenmode stiffness k c2 = 818 N/m by a recently established calibration protocol [ 62 ]. Next, a thermal power spectral density [ 63 ] of the cantilever was acquired close to the surface (within a few hundred nanometers) to determine the remaining cantilever properties ( f c1 , f c2 , Q c1 , Q c2 ). For this calibration step, the proximity to the surface is important.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectrogram method performed on a PPP-CONTR cantilever at a distance L spot from the cantilever base. (a) The PSD of the cantilever thermal motion (computed by the Daniell method 33 ) was measured at various distances across the cantilever to create (b) a spectrogram where the spectral density is represented in a gray scale. (c) The torsional peak can be identified and fit with a SHO model to determine the amplitude variance A 2 rms as a function of distance across the cantilever.…”
Section: B Spectrogram Calibration Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4: Spectral density of the first three eigenmodes of the AC240 cantilever from Figure 3. These data were calculated from a 2 s time series using the Daniell method 52 of PSD estimation to avoid bias and reduce effects of spurious noise peaks. Then, the spectra were corrected by the respective 𝛽 𝑛 computed by Eq.…”
Section: A Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%