2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision 2009
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2009.5459407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating contact dynamics

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been typically used in computer graphics for simulation purposes (Baraff 1989;Popovic and Witkin 1999), and further exported to computer vision applications, for non-rigid tracking of surfaces (Metaxas and Terzopoulos 1993) or articulated bodies (Brubaker et al 2009;Salzmann and Urtasun 2011;Vondrak et al 2008). Yet, none of these approaches 4 A.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has been typically used in computer graphics for simulation purposes (Baraff 1989;Popovic and Witkin 1999), and further exported to computer vision applications, for non-rigid tracking of surfaces (Metaxas and Terzopoulos 1993) or articulated bodies (Brubaker et al 2009;Salzmann and Urtasun 2011;Vondrak et al 2008). Yet, none of these approaches 4 A.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing inspiration from computer graphics (Popovic and Witkin 1999), there have been several attempts at using these models for tracking non-rigid motion (Metaxas and Terzopoulos 1993) and modeling human activities (Brubaker et al 2009). Unfortunately, these methods are usually focused to specific types of motion, and their underlying laws rely on non-linear relations complex to optimize.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of all the mechanical parameters used in the model are shown in Table 1, where M is the total mass of the robot. The model assumes that the ground is adequately soft, i.e., the contact points can be placed "below" the ground, and there is no pulling force exerting on G i when the contact points are above the ground [27,28]. Here, f g is the gravitational force, k x , k y and k z are the spring coefficients in the x, y and z direction respectively, while d x , d y and d z are damper coefficients.…”
Section: Model and Dynamics Of A Curved Beam Hopping Robotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brubaker et al [6,7,9] employed realistic metaphors of the lower body dynamics to estimate and predict walking. Going further, they incorporated a friction model for a ground that affords human motion upon it [8].…”
Section: Relevant Workmentioning
confidence: 99%