1963
DOI: 10.1017/s0003356100021462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates of the energy required for maintenance by adult sheep 2. Grazing sheep

Abstract: SUMMARYThe mean daily digestible organic matter intake (D) of each of 47 adult sheep during a grazing period of mean length 48 days was estimated by the chromium sesquioxide/faecal nitrogen technique. Mean live-weights (W) and mean daily weight gains (G) were also measured.The regression of D on W and G, and the underlying or functional relationship between D, W and G were both estimated. From the underlying relationship, the preferred equation, the maintenance requirement of a 100 lb. sheep at pasture is esti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equations 20, 25, 30 and 36 (Table 7) were the most effective models obtained in this study for predicting DOMI, for groups of 30 cows in weeks 1 to 4, 5 to 8, 9 to 12 and 13 to 16 of lactation, respectively; the population tolerance limits for groups of 30 cows in these equations were ±0-47, +0-56, +0-51 and ±0-39, respectively. If 1 lb DOM supplies 1-65 Meal of metabolizable energy (ME) (Langlands, Corbett, McDonald and Pullar, 1963), the tolerance limits on the least effective of these equations (no. 25) are equivalent to ±0-92 Meal in a total intake of about 36-6 Meal ME; the latter value (Agricultural Research Council, 1965) is for a 500-kg Ayrshire cow giving 20 kg of milk on a diet containing 2-6 Meal ME/kg DM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations 20, 25, 30 and 36 (Table 7) were the most effective models obtained in this study for predicting DOMI, for groups of 30 cows in weeks 1 to 4, 5 to 8, 9 to 12 and 13 to 16 of lactation, respectively; the population tolerance limits for groups of 30 cows in these equations were ±0-47, +0-56, +0-51 and ±0-39, respectively. If 1 lb DOM supplies 1-65 Meal of metabolizable energy (ME) (Langlands, Corbett, McDonald and Pullar, 1963), the tolerance limits on the least effective of these equations (no. 25) are equivalent to ±0-92 Meal in a total intake of about 36-6 Meal ME; the latter value (Agricultural Research Council, 1965) is for a 500-kg Ayrshire cow giving 20 kg of milk on a diet containing 2-6 Meal ME/kg DM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other exponents of live-weight calculated (equations 6 and 7) were also nearer to 1-0 than to 0-73-an observation also noted with sheep by Langlands et al (1963). The other exponents of live-weight calculated (equations 6 and 7) were also nearer to 1-0 than to 0-73-an observation also noted with sheep by Langlands et al (1963).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…For the same sheep in periods 1 and 2, after deducting 3-0 g. DOM per g. gain in live-weight (Langlands, Corbett, McDonald and Reid (1963)) for group 2 and 2-5 g. DOM per g. gain for the less mature sheep in group 3, the calculated equation was:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…J. F. Russel, personal communication). An automatic device for withdrawing blood samples at frequent intervals has also been developed (Farrell, Corbett & Leng, 1970) and lightweight infusion pumps which can be carried by sheep or cattle have been described by Leng, Corbett & Brett (1968) and Treacher (1973).…”
Section: Symposium Proceedings I974mentioning
confidence: 99%