2017
DOI: 10.2983/035.036.0310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates of Sea Scallop (Placopecten magellanicus) Incidental Mortality from Photographic Multiple Before—After-Control—Impact Surveys

Abstract: After several decades of stock decline, the Atlantic sea scallop (Placopecten magellanicus) resource has rebounded to become one of the most valuable fisheries in the United States. The continued sustainability of this fishery is supported by catch limits determined by annual stock projection models. Incidental mortality is an important term in these projection models, but is historically difficult to measure. Current estimates are derived from field experiments that relied heavily on qualitative observations … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One process entails an individual encountering the gear but not being captured (i.e., incidental mortality). While often difficult to measure in the field, some studies have been able to estimate incidental mortality rates empirically (Medcof and Bourne 1964;Caddy 1973;Murawski and Serchuk 1989;McLoughlin et al 1991;Ferraro et al 2017;Patterson et al 2017). The other component of the nonharvest mortality process results from an animal being captured and subsequently discarded (i.e., discard mortality; Broadhurst et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One process entails an individual encountering the gear but not being captured (i.e., incidental mortality). While often difficult to measure in the field, some studies have been able to estimate incidental mortality rates empirically (Medcof and Bourne 1964;Caddy 1973;Murawski and Serchuk 1989;McLoughlin et al 1991;Ferraro et al 2017;Patterson et al 2017). The other component of the nonharvest mortality process results from an animal being captured and subsequently discarded (i.e., discard mortality; Broadhurst et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The images used as a dataset were captured by a downwardpointing digital camera installed in the nose of the AUV. In the work of Ferraro [170], UAV was also used to collect color photos and side-scan sonar images of the seafloor to perform a quantitative estimate of incidental mortality using a precise and non-invasive method for sea scallops. AUV was also used to capture a reliable image of the seafloor to determine the density and size of the scallops, thus providing an accurate set of data for site surveys.…”
Section: Aquaculture Farm Monitoring and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 8 presents the different application of unmanned vehicles for aquaculture farm monitoring and management. GoPro camera and led lights [172] Assessment of the population/ stocks of wild scallops Gavia AUV Downward-pointing digital camera [169] Telegavia UAV a Point Grey Grasshopper 14S5C/M-C model with Sony ICZ285AL CCD [170] Teledyne Gavia AUV Nose cone camera, GeoSwath phase measuring bathymetric sonar, Marine Sonic side-scan sonar) [171] Monitoring of the growth environment at the farm site Customized ROV USB camera based on LIFI [165] Offshore kelp monitoring DJI Phantom 4 Pro 20 MP (1" CMOS sensor, 84 • FOV) color camera [168] Recognition of fish species Underwater drone (type not specified) 360-degree panoramic camera with two 235-degree fisheye lenses [174] Salmon protection Underwater laser drone Stereo camera system [177] Fish cage inspection BlueROV2 of BlueRobotics Camera [175] Observation of fish behavior Customized UAV Cameras with power LEDs and water quality sensors [56] Fish tracking AggieAir…”
Section: Aquaculture Farm Monitoring and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%