2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13968-2
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates of global and regional potential health gains from reducing multiple major risk factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
374
0
18

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 504 publications
(397 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
374
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…We assumed that changes in relative risks follow a dose-response relationship, 13,28 and that PAFs combine multiplicatively, 13,29 i.e. = 1 − ∏ (1 − ) where the i's denote independent risk factors.…”
Section: Health Modelling Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assumed that changes in relative risks follow a dose-response relationship, 13,28 and that PAFs combine multiplicatively, 13,29 i.e. = 1 − ∏ (1 − ) where the i's denote independent risk factors.…”
Section: Health Modelling Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their precise contribution had been unclear until the global burden of disease (GBD) was analyzed by using comparative risk assessment (CRA). It has been estimated that globally, 1.8% deaths in 2000 were attributable to low fruit and vegetable intake [4,5] . The figures were 6% in low-and-middle-income countries, and 3% in high-income countries [6] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Indeed, the mean blood pressure of adults has decreased over the past two decades. 13 Cigarette smoking is one of the most important avoidable causes of cardiovascular disease worldwide 1,2 and emerging data suggest that second hand smoke (smoking habits of family members such as parental smoking) is associated with adverse health affects. 14,15 Risk factors such as high blood pressure, parental smoking are common among Turkish children and adolescents 16 and cardiovascular risk profile in Turkish children appear to be unique compared to different populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%